Māori speech-language therapy research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review

Meechan, Ryan J. H.; Brewer, Karen

doi:10.1080/2050571x.2021.1954836

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The CONSIDER framework has previously been used as a quality assessment tool 31 but, as far as we are aware, this is the first study protocol to use the CONSIDER framework as a structure. This novel approach is a major strength of our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A similar approach has been used previously in a scoping review. 31 For ease of use and reporting we have condensed the CONSIDER checklist to one item for each domain, based on what is of most relevance to our research question. Critical appraisal will be undertaken after data extraction is complete and before data synthesis begins.…”

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CONSIDER was designed as a checklist to strengthen the reporting of research involving Indigenous Peoples but for this systematic review we have adapted it to be an evaluation tool for how the research was undertaken. A similar approach has been used previously in a scoping review 31. For ease of use and reporting we have condensed the CONSIDER checklist to one item for each domain, based on what is of most relevance to our research question.…”

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

What are the gaps in cardiovascular risk assessment and management in primary care for Māori and Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand? Protocol for a systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionIn New Zealand, significant inequities exist between Māori and Pacific peoples compared with non-Māori, non-Pacific peoples in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, hospitalisations and management rates. This review will quantify and qualify already-reported gaps in CVD risk assessment and management in primary care for Māori and Pacific peoples compared with non-Māori/non-Pacific peoples in New Zealand.Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic search of the following electronic databases and websites from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2021: MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, NZresearch.org, National Library Catalogue (Te Puna), Index New Zealand (INNZ), Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre. In addition, we will search relevant websites such as the Ministry of Health and research organisations. Data sources will include published peer reviewed articles, reports and theses employing qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods.Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts of the citations and grade each as eligible, not eligible or might be eligible. Two reviewers will read each full report, with one medically qualified reviewer reading all reports and two other reviewers reading half each. The final list of included citations will be compiled from the results of the full report reading and agreed on by three reviewers. Data abstracted will include authors, title, year, study characteristics and participant characteristics. Data analysis and interpretation will involve critical inquiry and a strength-based approach that is inclusive of Māori and Pacific values. This means that critical appraisal includes an assessment of quality from an Indigenous perspective.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. The findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and shared with stakeholders. This review contributes to a larger project which creates a Quality-Improvement Equity Roadmap to reduce barriers to Māori and Pacific peoples accessing evidence-based CVD care.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methods and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What are the gaps in cardiovascular risk assessment and management in primary care for Māori and Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand? Protocol for a systematic review

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We utilised the CONSolIDated criTEria (CONSIDER) statement (Huria et al 2019 ) to assess whether studies included equitable and ethical health research practices involving Indigenous populations. The quality of these studies in relation to Indigenous priorities and the advancement of Indigenous health was also assessed using the CONSIDER tool (Meechan and Brewer 2021 ; Wright et al 2022 ). Each of the 17 statements from the CONSIDER criteria was rated (yes (score of 1) or no (0 score)) to provide a total score out of a possible 17.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indigenous approaches to perinatal mental health: a systematic review with critical interpretive synthesis

Meredith

McKerchar

Lacey

2023

Arch Womens Ment Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indigenous mothers and birthing parents experience significant inequities during the perinatal period, with mental health distress causing adverse outcomes for mothers/birthing parents and their infants. Limited literature is available to inform our understanding of solutions to these issues, with research primarily focusing on inequities. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of Indigenous approaches to treatment of perinatal mental health illness. Following the PRISMA guidelines for systematic literature reviews, an electronic search of CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, Embase, APA PsycInfo, OVID Nursing, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases was conducted in January and February 2022 and repeated in June 2022. Twenty-seven studies were included in the final review. A critical interpretive synthesis informed our approach to the systematic review. The work of (Yamane and Helm J Prev 43:167–190, 2022) was drawn upon to differentiate studies and place within a cultural continuum framework. Across the 27 studies, the majority of participants were healthcare workers and other staff. Mothers, birthing parents, and their families were represented in small numbers. Outcomes of interest included a reduction in symptoms, a reduction in high-risk behaviours, and parental engagement/attachment of mothers/birthing parents with their babies. Interventions infrequently reported significant reductions in mental health symptoms, and many included studies focused on qualitative assessments of intervention acceptability or utility. Many studies focused on describing approaches to perinatal mental health distress or considered the perspectives and priorities of families and healthcare workers. More research and evaluation of Indigenous interventions for perinatal mental health illness is required. Future research should be designed to privilege the voices, perspectives, and experiences of Indigenous mothers, birthing parents, and their families. Researchers should ensure that any future studies should arise from the priorities of the Indigenous population being studied and be Indigenous-led and designed.

show abstract

Māori aspirations following stroke: A pathway forward for the speech-language therapy field

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Māori speech-language therapy research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a scoping review

Cited by 5 publications

References 27 publications

What are the gaps in cardiovascular risk assessment and management in primary care for Māori and Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand? Protocol for a systematic review

What are the gaps in cardiovascular risk assessment and management in primary care for Māori and Pacific people in Aotearoa New Zealand? Protocol for a systematic review

Indigenous approaches to perinatal mental health: a systematic review with critical interpretive synthesis

Māori aspirations following stroke: A pathway forward for the speech-language therapy field

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About