2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Many-objective optimization with improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm for inter-basin water transfers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A decision maker must allocate limited water to different water use sectors considering the conflicting objectives (e.g., benefits and costs) and multiple uncertainties (e.g., forecast uncertainty) in a forecast-based reservoir operation system. Multi-objective programming (MOP) is a valuable tool for helping decision makers facilitate decision-making with multiple conflicting objectives (Fang et al, 2018b;Guo et al, 2020c), which can offer feasible methods for generating compromise decision alternatives. Some MOP approaches have been widely developed to tackle the uncertainty associated with the decision-making processes, such as multi-objective fuzzy programming (Zimmermann, 1978;Pishvaee and Razmi, 2012;Ren et al, 2017) and multiobjective stochastic programming (Xu et al, 2014(Xu et al, , 2020Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decision maker must allocate limited water to different water use sectors considering the conflicting objectives (e.g., benefits and costs) and multiple uncertainties (e.g., forecast uncertainty) in a forecast-based reservoir operation system. Multi-objective programming (MOP) is a valuable tool for helping decision makers facilitate decision-making with multiple conflicting objectives (Fang et al, 2018b;Guo et al, 2020c), which can offer feasible methods for generating compromise decision alternatives. Some MOP approaches have been widely developed to tackle the uncertainty associated with the decision-making processes, such as multi-objective fuzzy programming (Zimmermann, 1978;Pishvaee and Razmi, 2012;Ren et al, 2017) and multiobjective stochastic programming (Xu et al, 2014(Xu et al, , 2020Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al proposed a hybrid multi-agent Coordination Optimization Algorithm (MCO) 15 that, applies a coordination mechanism to accelerate convergence. Guo et al presented a many-objective optimization with an improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm 16 . Liu et al proposed a novel multi-objective optimization algorithm based on Bacterial Foraging algorithm 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang HP et al (2019) proposed a hybrid multi-agent Coordination Optimization Algorithm (MCO) 11 , applying a coordination mechanism to accelerate convergence. Guo Y et al (2020) proposed a many-objective optimization with an improved shuffled frog leaping algorithm 12 . Liu Y et al (2020) proposed a novel multi-objective optimization algorithm based on bacterial foraging 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%