Manufacturing Zero-Waste COVID-19 Personal Protection Equipment: a Case Study of Utilizing 3D Printing While Employing Waste Material Recycling

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic outbreak dictated the extensive use of personal protective equipment (PPE) by the majority of the population and mostly by frontline professionals. This need triggered a sudden demand that led to a global shortage of available PPEs threatening to have an immense contribution to the virus contamination spread. In these conditions, the need for a local, flexible, and rapid manufacturing method that would be able to cope with the increased demand for PPE fabrication arose. 3D printing proved to be such a manufacturing technique since its working principles make it an ideal technology for local, decentralized production of PPEs meeting the local demands. While considered to be more environmentally friendly than conventional fabrication techniques and aligning well with the principles of sustainability and circular economy, 3D printing can produce waste as the result of potential failed prints and material used for the fabrication of support structures. This paper describes the case of utilizing pre-existing FDM 3D printing equipment in an academic facility for the production of PPEs (face shields) and their distribution according to local demands. The plastic wastes produced were forwarded to a recycling process that led to their conversion to 3D filament that would be returned to the academic facility as raw material for future 3D printing operations. The followed procedure minimized 3D printing waste and led to a zerowaste fabrication case that was initiated in a pandemic for a greater-good cause (production of COVID-19 fighting PPEs) while assimilating the values of sustainability and circular economy.

The Unprecedented Role of 3D Printing Technology in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review

“…An American aerospace manufacturing company Blue Origin and 3D printer manufacturer Carbon have also contributed to producing the face shields [ 28 ]. Kantaros et al [ 53 ] utilized pre-existing FDM 3D printing equipment in an academic facility to produce 800 face shields in Greece.…”

Digital Twins in the Automotive Industry: The Road toward Physical-Digital Convergence

“…At that point, designers start with a simple exterior and interior modeling and then proceed with the design of the vehicle's individual components. Physical prototyping has also evolved nowadays with the introduction of 3D printing technology that allows designers to fabricate physical prototypes of their designs rapidly for testing operations [50][51][52][53][54][55]. However, while physical prototyping is essential, the simultaneous presence of a Digital Twin is of paramount importance for the automotive companies.…”

Digital Twin and Its Implementation in 3D Printing: A Research Review

“…Additionally, failed 3d prints can also be the result of other issues such as motor stall, timing belt break, breaking failure, nozzle blockage, items getting detached from the 3d printer's bed, abnormal extrusion and so on. Oftentimes, such errors result in 19% of material waste on average whereas, in case of FDM 3D printers, almost 34% of total materials, including the material used for support structures are wasted [8]. As a result, there have been breakthroughs in fourth industrial revolution technologies, often characterized by big data, Machine Learning (ML) along with the Internet of Things (IoT) to solve such issues [9].…”