2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing, sustainability, ecodesign and risk: lessons learned from a study of Swedish and English companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustainability methodologies adopted by the industry have been studied, including their eco-design and risk [23]. Source reduction, reuse and recycling measures, waste collection frequency, staff participation in training programs and waste disposal methods were all found to affect attitudes toward waste management.…”
Section: Countrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability methodologies adopted by the industry have been studied, including their eco-design and risk [23]. Source reduction, reuse and recycling measures, waste collection frequency, staff participation in training programs and waste disposal methods were all found to affect attitudes toward waste management.…”
Section: Countrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the relatively low level of engagement within the industry (Sherwin, 2012;Short et al, 2012;Stevenson, 2013), one might question why so much effort is put into educating future generations of designers about these issues when time might be better spent focusing solely on the skills that the design industry currently utilise. However, to move beyond the status quo, there is a real need to equip product designers with the knowledge, skills, interest, support and environment to create socially and environmentally responsible products, services and systems as part of their mainstream work.…”
Section: Discussion: Reflecting On the Gap Between Theory And Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research from numerous sources shows that designers typically do not use eco-design tools and methods for a variety of different reasons (Lofthouse, 2006;Luttropp & Lagerstedt, 2006;Macdonald-Smith & Short, 2007;Short et al, 2012). Despite this lack of uptake of eco-design tools, in the Design School at Loughborough University, they are still considered to be an important component of a well-rounded sustainable design education.…”
Section: Discussion: Reflecting On the Gap Between Theory And Realitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned in the former subchapter 3.3.2 Challenges and barriers, there are barriers (Jönbrink et al, 2013;van Hemel and Cramer, 2002;Poulikidou et al, 2014;Bey et al, 2013), obstacles (Boks, 2006), hurdles and hinders (Short et al, 2012) described in prior studies, which can hamper the inclusion of sustainability aspects in product development. These barriers, obstacles, hurdles and hinders may also be seen as reasons for challenges related to the inclusion of sustainability aspects in product development.…”
Section: Reasons For Challenges and Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%