2018 Congreso Internacional De Innovación Y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/coniiti.2018.8587109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing Strategies for an Optimal Pull-Type Production Control System. Case Study in a Textile Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is thanks to the fact that letters can be used that detail pending activities and have relevant information that the operator should know. (Mohan, 2020) (Aldas et al 2018). In case studies such as Sosa's (2020), it could be seen that applying these tools in a textile factory generated a good impact, thus increasing efficiency from 55.88% to 76.79%.…”
Section: Kanban Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is thanks to the fact that letters can be used that detail pending activities and have relevant information that the operator should know. (Mohan, 2020) (Aldas et al 2018). In case studies such as Sosa's (2020), it could be seen that applying these tools in a textile factory generated a good impact, thus increasing efficiency from 55.88% to 76.79%.…”
Section: Kanban Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have developed a method for assessment of pull production system according to twenty-three parameters divided in three groups: design, stability, and control [51]. In addition, Aldas et al have investigated Kanban, Conwip and DBR by simulating production process in the textile industry and concluded with the preference of Kanban over Conwip and DBR [52]. Piplani and Ang, [53], compared Base Stock, Traditional Kanban Control System and Extended Kanban Control System (both dedicated and shared type) by simulation using common total cost measure as a performance measure for comparison.…”
Section: Pull Control Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%