2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40684-020-00287-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing of Compound Parabolic Concentrator Devices Using an Ultra-fine Planing Method for Enhancing Efficiency of a Solar Cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface quality and dimensional accuracy of the 3D‐printed samples are comparable to those made by conventional optics fabrication methods. [ 44 ] Therefore, zooming‐focused MIP‐VPP makes it possible to fabricate high‐quality optical lenses rapidly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface quality and dimensional accuracy of the 3D‐printed samples are comparable to those made by conventional optics fabrication methods. [ 44 ] Therefore, zooming‐focused MIP‐VPP makes it possible to fabricate high‐quality optical lenses rapidly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy-harvesting devices also require bifunctional surfaces. For example, the light scattering caused by fog droplets and foulant contamination on the solar panels decrease the energy conversion efficiency; therefore, a bifunctional surface with antifogging and antifouling properties can be used to address these problems. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the light scattering caused by fog droplets and foulant contamination on the solar panels decrease the energy conversion efficiency; therefore, a bifunctional surface with antifogging and antifouling properties can be used to address these problems. 43,44 Figure 2a illustrates the fabrication procedure of the nanostructured OA-PEG copolymer. First, PEGDMA and OA were mixed at 70 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the imaging receivers suggest a more compact design, still with a reasonable FOV compared to the non-imaging counterparts. Furthermore, aspheric lenses are available commercially from small diameters (few millimeters) to large diameters (tens of centimeters), while the range of CPC is limited due to less commercial demand [54].…”
Section: Comparison Between Imaging and Non-imaging Receiversmentioning
confidence: 99%