2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.06.196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturing design of the ITER vacuum vessel lower port in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full‐scale mock‐up of the lower port stub extension #16 was fabricated to verify the fabrication feasibility and setup of the fabrication sequence for the lower port stub extension. Finally, for welding of inner shells and T ribs, the entire fabrication sequence including welding and nondestructive examination methods (e.g., ultrasonic test or examination) has been established in Korea as the suppliers have a mission with challenging tolerance and inspection requirements …”
Section: Progress Of the Iter Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A full‐scale mock‐up of the lower port stub extension #16 was fabricated to verify the fabrication feasibility and setup of the fabrication sequence for the lower port stub extension. Finally, for welding of inner shells and T ribs, the entire fabrication sequence including welding and nondestructive examination methods (e.g., ultrasonic test or examination) has been established in Korea as the suppliers have a mission with challenging tolerance and inspection requirements …”
Section: Progress Of the Iter Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for welding of inner shells and T ribs, the entire fabrication sequence including welding and nondestructive examination methods (e.g., ultrasonic test or examination) has been established in Korea as the suppliers have a mission with challenging tolerance and inspection requirements. 13,14…”
Section: Vv Portsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on its role as the first safety barrier and mechanical support for plasma-facing components, the ITER VV is classified as a safety-important component and a protectionimportant component [12]. Specifically, it is classified as category IV pressure equipment under the French Decree on the design and construction of pressure equipment (ESP) and as Nuclear level N2 under the French Order Concerning Nuclear Pressure Equipment because pressurized cooling water (i.e., up to 1.1 MPa in normal operation) is applied during its operation [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is classified as category IV pressure equipment under the French Decree on the design and construction of pressure equipment (ESP) and as Nuclear level N2 under the French Order Concerning Nuclear Pressure Equipment because pressurized cooling water (i.e., up to 1.1 MPa in normal operation) is applied during its operation [13,14]. Moreover, it is categorized as a class-2 welded box structure with supporting and leak-tight components according to RCC-MR 2007, which is the relevant technical guideline pertaining to its design and construction [12][13][14]. The manufactured ITER VV must comply with the assigned codes, regulations, and ITER requirements, including all manufacturing processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%