Manufacturer’s Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Ding, Fan; Lu, Zhangping; Jin, Mengfan; Sun, Luanhong

doi:10.3390/ijerph191610407

Cited by 7 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(70 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Referring to Shen et al [ 46 ] and Ding et al [ 47 ], it is assumed that two classes of participants are risk-neutral and there is no information asymmetry, i.e., both the manufacturers and the government share information.…”

Section: Problem Description and Assumptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of a Mixed Emissions Control Policy on the Manufacturer’s Production and Carbon Abatement Investment Decisions

Wang¹,

Zhang

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Considering the consumers’ environmental awareness, a mixed emissions control policy with carbon tax and a dynamic reward-punishment mechanism for carbon abatements was introduced to explore the manufacturer’s low-carbon production issues. The results showed that: (1) Under a given mixed emissions control policy, a higher government pre-determined abatement target cannot positively encourage manufacturers’ carbon abatement behaviors. However, a stricter emissions control policy is environmentally beneficial only when the government pre-determined abatement target exceeds a certain threshold. (2) Reducing the carbon abatement cost and enhancing the consumers’ environmental awareness would always benefit manufacturers’ low-carbon production, but both approaches benefit the environment only when the government pre-determined abatement target is below a certain threshold. (3) Under a mixed emissions control policy of social welfare maximization, the reward-punishment coefficient positively correlates with the government’s optimal pre-determined abatement target, and the effect of the carbon tax rate on that is closely related to the carbon emissions of the unit product. More importantly, imposing a carbon tax or raising the tax rate and adopting a reward-punishment mechanism or raising the reward-punishment coefficient can effectively encourage manufacturers’ carbon abatement investment behaviors. However, they have nothing but a negative effect on manufacturers’ excessive abatement levels.

show abstract

Section: Problem Description and Assumptionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of a Mixed Emissions Control Policy on the Manufacturer’s Production and Carbon Abatement Investment Decisions

Wang¹,

Zhang

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The scientific contribution of the research is especially important for developed enterprises and countries, which identify their prosperity with a sustainable future and whose resources enable or transform such a transformation in order to achieve greater/faster sustainability. The contribution of the study is also important due to the lack of knowledge about the nature of SD, as was found out [ 111 ], and because different actions that have a positive impact on today’s world become an inevitable trend in the SD era [ 112 ]. Sustainable solutions play a significant role [ 113 ] in contributing to global SD [ 114 ] and must be supported also by theoretical contribution represented by the newly developed model in this study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment

Lazar

Potočan

Klimecka-Tatar

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The importance of sustainability in supply chain management is growing worldwide. It is possible to find reasons for this using various phenomena that negatively affect humanity, e.g., climate change, scarce materials, supply disruptions, and complex fossil fuel dependency. Because of that, is extremely important to constantly look for new ways to systematically increase sustainability in enterprises and their logistics and supply chain processes by considering different stakeholders and influential factors. Therefore, this paper explores how different types of organizational culture and normative commitment impact sustainability and each other in business logistics and supply chains and develops a conceptual model to manage this challenge. Gaining new insights is valuable especially for managers to obtain better information on how to improve sustainability not just by integrating green technologies but mainly by changing culture, attitude, and perception in their enterprises. The research is focused on employees from global logistics or related branches in micro, small, medium, and large enterprises with the primary activity mostly related to manufacturing, transport, and storage. The findings are based on the questionnaire which was sent directly to 1576 employees from 528 enterprises. A total of 516 employees from enterprises that are mostly located in 34 countries responded to requests for participation. The results reveal statistically significant positive and negative impacts, e.g., clan culture has a positive statistically significant impact on the sustainable development of supply chains. Most of the connections to the eighth Sustainable Development Goal by the United Nations (decent work and economic growth) were also found, which was the enterprise’s highest priority with a share of 52.99%. A contribution to the theory development is gained using the developed model that considers both positive and negative statistically significant impacts studied.

show abstract

“…Effective information updates are more efficient at reducing carbon emissions than promotional allowances. Ding et al [37] investigated manufacturers' decisions on encroachment and carbon emissions reduction, taking into account the carbon trading system and consumers' preferences for low-carbon production. The findings indicated that manufacturers invariably benefited from encroachment decisions if the government opted against cap-and-trade regulations, leading to consistent profit losses for retailers.…”

Section: Customers' Low-carbon Preferencementioning

confidence: 99%

The Emission Reduction Technology Decision of the Port Supply Chain

Zhou,

Zhou

2024

Mathematics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The technology options for sustainable development are explored with customer low-carbon preference in a port supply chain consisting of one ship and one port. Port supply chains can opt for either shower power or low-sulfur fuel oil to cut down emissions. We set game models considering three power structures: the port dominant (port-led Stackelberg game), the ship dominant (ship-led Stackelberg game), and the port and ship on the same footing (Nash game). We compare the performances of different technologies. It is shown that, when customer low-carbon preference and carbon tax are both low, LSFO is the appropriate choice from the supply chain’s profit perspective, SP is preferred from the emission control perspective, and LSFO is preferred from the social welfare perspective. However, when customers’ low-carbon preferences, carbon tax, and environmental concerns are all low or all high, LSFO should be adopted from the view of social welfare. The profits and carbon emissions of the supply chain in the Nash game are higher than those in the Stackelberg game. While the environmental concern is low, the social welfare of the supply chain in the Nash game is greater than that in the Stackelberg game. Otherwise, it is less than that in the Stackelberg game. The obtained results can help governments formulate policies and ships make emission reduction technology decisions according to their own interests.

show abstract

Manufacturer’s Encroachment and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions Considering Cap-and-Trade Regulation and Consumers’ Low-Carbon Preference

Cited by 7 publications

References 34 publications

Effects of a Mixed Emissions Control Policy on the Manufacturer’s Production and Carbon Abatement Investment Decisions

Effects of a Mixed Emissions Control Policy on the Manufacturer’s Production and Carbon Abatement Investment Decisions

Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment

The Emission Reduction Technology Decision of the Port Supply Chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About