2013
DOI: 10.21608/mjae.2013.102127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacture and Performance Evaluation of a Circular Saw Mower for Cutting Some Crop Residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, an increase in forward speed was associated with a rise in the number of uncut stalks. El-Sharabasy (2006) engineered and produced a self-propelled machine specifically tailored for cutting diverse grain crops to optimize efficiency and lessen losses. The study showcased that the peak field capacity 0.452 fed/h and the most economical operating cost 37.50 EGP/fed were achieved under low kinematic parameters (1.8, 1.45) and a diminished grain moisture content of 21.45%, 19.11%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, an increase in forward speed was associated with a rise in the number of uncut stalks. El-Sharabasy (2006) engineered and produced a self-propelled machine specifically tailored for cutting diverse grain crops to optimize efficiency and lessen losses. The study showcased that the peak field capacity 0.452 fed/h and the most economical operating cost 37.50 EGP/fed were achieved under low kinematic parameters (1.8, 1.45) and a diminished grain moisture content of 21.45%, 19.11%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study showcased that the peak field capacity 0.452 fed/h and the most economical operating cost 37.50 EGP/fed were achieved under low kinematic parameters (1.8, 1.45) and a diminished grain moisture content of 21.45%, 19.11%. El-Sharabasy (1997) and Badr (2005) studied the comparison between different harvesters (power reaper, self-propelled mower, rear-mounted mower, and small combine harvester) in wheat and rice fields; it was observed that the smallest grain loss 1.66% occurred with the small combine harvester. They evaluate their performance across various parameters, including grain losses, fuel consumption, energy requirements, harvesting time, and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%