2012
DOI: 10.1177/0954405412437125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturability verification through feature-based ontological product models

Abstract: 2 Abstract: To achieve efficient, fast and cost effective production, designers must consider all the manufacturing stages a product has to go through. A case study in a manufacturing setup shows that due to the differences in perception of an engineering component, the coordination between design and manufacturing becomes difficult.Semantic interoperability problems are therefore faced when knowledge sharing for the purpose of manufacturability verification is attempted through computer-based knowledge bases.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autonomous systems require intensive knowledge sharing at every level of the value chain, which is why interoperability has already been identified by industry (Anjum et al 2012) and standardization organizations as a strategic area of action (DKE/DIN 2020). Application-driven representational choices (Sanfilippo and Borgo 2016) added to the lack of use of existing information standards (Rogstrand and Kjellberg 2009) have been appointed as hurdles for interoperability.…”
Section: Information Representation In Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomous systems require intensive knowledge sharing at every level of the value chain, which is why interoperability has already been identified by industry (Anjum et al 2012) and standardization organizations as a strategic area of action (DKE/DIN 2020). Application-driven representational choices (Sanfilippo and Borgo 2016) added to the lack of use of existing information standards (Rogstrand and Kjellberg 2009) have been appointed as hurdles for interoperability.…”
Section: Information Representation In Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to note that there also exist relations among different resources, i.e. machine, setup, and cutting tool, which is not reflected in the proposed model; and a machining process may generate multiple features as described by Najam et al (Anjum et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Rmpfq Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…n-ary predicates. Usman and colleagues [97] propose the Manufacturing Core Ontology (MCCO) as a common semantic foundation for knowledge representation in manufacturing; the ontology is extended and exploited in [98] for manufacturability analysis and verification. Among its classes, the MCCO includes 'realised part', 'part version', 'manufacturing facility' and 'manufacturing process', which are associated via different relationships.…”
Section: Representing Features In Information Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontological constraints of this kind are not only needed to explicitly characterise assumptions on what features are, but also to verify product models against experts' assumptions, see e.g. [54,98].…”
Section: Open Problems In Today's Feature-based Modeling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%