2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0218-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manufacturability evaluation for molded parts using fictitious physical models, and its application in topology optimization

Abstract: Manufacturing methods using molds, such as casting and injection molding, are widely used in industries. A basic requirement when using such manufacturing methods is that design engineers must design products so that they incorporate certain geometrical features that allow the mold parts to be removed from the created solid object. In the present study, we propose a manufacturability evaluation method especially adapted for the use of molds. To evaluate the manufacturability, we introduce fictitious physical m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To consider the manufacturability of the structure in the topology optimization process, it is needed to detect an inner void and undercut, which are inappropriate to manufacture, and define a mathematical formulation for determining those volumes. The manufacturability evaluation of this research is based on the previous research by Sato et al (Sato et al, 2017) where a fictitious heat flux model is applied. In this fictitious physical model, the fictitious heat fluxes propagate from the outer boundaries of the analysis model in designated directions that demonstrate the movements of the manufacturing tools, such as parting dies in the casting and molding process.…”
Section: Manufacturability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To consider the manufacturability of the structure in the topology optimization process, it is needed to detect an inner void and undercut, which are inappropriate to manufacture, and define a mathematical formulation for determining those volumes. The manufacturability evaluation of this research is based on the previous research by Sato et al (Sato et al, 2017) where a fictitious heat flux model is applied. In this fictitious physical model, the fictitious heat fluxes propagate from the outer boundaries of the analysis model in designated directions that demonstrate the movements of the manufacturing tools, such as parting dies in the casting and molding process.…”
Section: Manufacturability Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the manufacturing evaluation approaches in DFM, based on intuition of the engineers and lumped parameters, cannot be directly applied to the topology optimization process where the structural configuration is implicitly defined by the topo logical variables. To deal with this issue, several papers have proposed a new problem formulation that incorporates a quantitative manufacturability evaluation technique (Sato et al, 2017) and an updating scheme for the topological design variable regarding the manufacturing constraint (Xia et al, 2010). They utilized predefined parting directions of the molds to define and minimize the total area of nonmanufacturable domain, such as undercuts and interior voids, and to restrict the propagation of the structural boundaries to gain manufacturability during topology optimization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, PDE-based approaches are used in many related fields; these are described in the following section. Topology optimization: The use of PDE-based feature evaluation has been proposed for topology optimization [46]. The manufacturability in molding is evaluated by superposition of the solution to the PDE.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the concept of the fictitious physical model (FPM) [6] for representing geometrical constraint can be avoid such issues. Therefore, the main aim of this paper is to formulate a FPM for representing the thickness constraint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%