1997
DOI: 10.1080/135765097397486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual Specialisation and Tool Use in Captive Chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ): The Effect of Unimanual and Bimanual Strategies on Hand Preference

Abstract: Hand preference for tool use was assessed in a sample of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Whether the subjects solved the tool task using either a unimanual or coordinated bimanual strategy was manipulated in the chimpanzees. No population-level hand preference was found for tool use when unimanual strategies were used by the chimpanzees. However, a population-level right-hand bias was found when coordinated bimanual actions were required of the chimpanzees. A significant correlation was found in hand us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, current data indicate that hand-preference measures can be biased by several variables, such as the postural demands in performing specific activities, the number of actions involved in solving a specific task, and the need to use both hands simultaneously to execute a particular motor pattern [Harrison & Byrne, 2000;Hopkins, 1993Hopkins, , 1995Hopkins & Rabinowitz, 1997;McGrew & Marchant, 1997;Spinozzi et al, 1998;Spinozzi & Truppa, 1999, 2002Westergaard et al, 1997Westergaard et al, , 1998Westergaard & Suomi, 1996]. For example, data from capuchins show that reaching actions involving the complementary use of hands for food retrieval elicit a significant hand bias at the group level, while coordinated-bimanual tasks involving a sequence of problem-solving actions induce strong individual hand preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, current data indicate that hand-preference measures can be biased by several variables, such as the postural demands in performing specific activities, the number of actions involved in solving a specific task, and the need to use both hands simultaneously to execute a particular motor pattern [Harrison & Byrne, 2000;Hopkins, 1993Hopkins, , 1995Hopkins & Rabinowitz, 1997;McGrew & Marchant, 1997;Spinozzi et al, 1998;Spinozzi & Truppa, 1999, 2002Westergaard et al, 1997Westergaard et al, , 1998Westergaard & Suomi, 1996]. For example, data from capuchins show that reaching actions involving the complementary use of hands for food retrieval elicit a significant hand bias at the group level, while coordinated-bimanual tasks involving a sequence of problem-solving actions induce strong individual hand preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This way, the choice of the throwing hand is not influenced by the configuration of the experiment. The presence of the target increases the precision of the tasks, which ameliorates the determination of the handedness of the individual (Hopkins 1997).…”
Section: (I) Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[82]). The task that is most frequently used at present to elicit such behaviours in captive populations is the tube task [83], an extractive feeding task involving an opaque polyvinylchloride (PVC) tube containing smears of peanut butter that can be extracted if one hand holds the tube while part of the other hand is inserted into it.…”
Section: Mastering the Functional Parameters Of Percussive Actions: Ementioning
confidence: 99%