2015
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual Compared With Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Abortion at Less Than 6 Weeks of Gestation

Abstract: I.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Last, we also acknowledge the evidence basis for the safety of manual vacuum aspiration, which was temporarily not performed at our institution during this timeframe. Indeed, previous authors have demonstrated similarly low complication rates with MVA when compared to EVA [ 15 17 ], suggesting that inferences of the benefit of transvaginal ultrasonography in this population can be made as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Last, we also acknowledge the evidence basis for the safety of manual vacuum aspiration, which was temporarily not performed at our institution during this timeframe. Indeed, previous authors have demonstrated similarly low complication rates with MVA when compared to EVA [ 15 17 ], suggesting that inferences of the benefit of transvaginal ultrasonography in this population can be made as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A total of 114 RCTs were included in the review . The PRISMA flow chart in Figure S1 shows study selection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, we selected MVA for uterine drainage, but the choice of EVA is also available. MVA is more portable, less expensive, clean, quiet, does not require electricity 5 6. The plastic cannula used in MVA is less likely to damage the endometrial basal layer due to its adequate stiffness and high flexibility 6.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%