2022
DOI: 10.1177/09645284221085278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manual acupuncture at ST36 attenuates rheumatoid arthritis by inhibiting M1 macrophage polarization and enhancing Treg cell populations in adjuvant-induced arthritic rats

Abstract: Objectives: Acupuncture has been found to be effective at relieving many inflammatory pain conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to assess the anti-inflammatory potential of manual acupuncture (MA) treatment of RA using adjuvant-induced arthritic (AIA) rats and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Methods: The anti-inflammatory and analgesic actions of MA at ST36 ( Zusanli) in AIA rats were assessed using paw withdrawal latency and swelling, histological examination and cytokine detection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality assessments of the 21 studies are summarized in Figure 2 . 13 studies were rated as having a low risk for the sequence generation bias, as they mentioned the rats were randomly grouped ( Yu et al, 2009 ; He et al, 2011 ; Qiao et al, 2012 ; Shou et al, 2013 ; Zhu et al, 2015 ; Dong et al, 2018 ; Ma et al, 2018 ; Xu et al, 2018 ; Su et al, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2019 ; Gusmao et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2021 ; Yang et al, 2021 ; Zheng et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2022 ); the remaining 8 studies did not mention the criteria for grouping. All the studies started with rats of similar weights, and they were kept under similar environmental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The quality assessments of the 21 studies are summarized in Figure 2 . 13 studies were rated as having a low risk for the sequence generation bias, as they mentioned the rats were randomly grouped ( Yu et al, 2009 ; He et al, 2011 ; Qiao et al, 2012 ; Shou et al, 2013 ; Zhu et al, 2015 ; Dong et al, 2018 ; Ma et al, 2018 ; Xu et al, 2018 ; Su et al, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2019 ; Gusmao et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2021 ; Yang et al, 2021 ; Zheng et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2022 ); the remaining 8 studies did not mention the criteria for grouping. All the studies started with rats of similar weights, and they were kept under similar environmental conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baselines of groups were similar except in 1 study ( Park et al, 2006 ); the initial PWL, PWT or the paw volume values after disease induction were similar. 10 studies informed that the behavioral tests were taken by examiners blinded from the experiments ( Sun et al, 2006 ; Shan et al, 2007 ; Sun et al, 2008 ; Mi et al, 2011 ; Shou et al, 2013 ; Zhu et al, 2015 ; Chai et al, 2018 ; Xu et al, 2018 ; Yang et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2022 ). The statistical analyses were taken in blind manner in one study ( Shou et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations