“…The quality assessments of the 21 studies are summarized in Figure 2 . 13 studies were rated as having a low risk for the sequence generation bias, as they mentioned the rats were randomly grouped ( Yu et al, 2009 ; He et al, 2011 ; Qiao et al, 2012 ; Shou et al, 2013 ; Zhu et al, 2015 ; Dong et al, 2018 ; Ma et al, 2018 ; Xu et al, 2018 ; Su et al, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2019 ; Gusmao et al, 2021 ; Shen et al, 2021 ; Yang et al, 2021 ; Zheng et al, 2021 ; Yu et al, 2022 ); the remaining 8 studies did not mention the criteria for grouping. All the studies started with rats of similar weights, and they were kept under similar environmental conditions.…”