2014
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mantra 2.0: an online collaborative resource for drug mode of action and repurposing by network analysis

Abstract: The web tool is freely available for academic use at http://mantra.tigem.it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the overlap between the four target sets was minimal, with only 2 genes being common targets for rapamycin and for LY‐294002 ( let‐363 , a homologue of mTOR , and rps‐6 ), it is still possible that all mechanisms converge to a downstream signature. This idea is further supported by our MANTRA (Carrella et al ., 2014) analysis, which allows the visualization of the similarity in induced gene expression for a set of drugs using a network (Fig. S17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the overlap between the four target sets was minimal, with only 2 genes being common targets for rapamycin and for LY‐294002 ( let‐363 , a homologue of mTOR , and rps‐6 ), it is still possible that all mechanisms converge to a downstream signature. This idea is further supported by our MANTRA (Carrella et al ., 2014) analysis, which allows the visualization of the similarity in induced gene expression for a set of drugs using a network (Fig. S17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DrugSig is different from the existing webservers or databases for drug repositioning. Although several drug repositioning related webservers or databases exist such as CMap, PREDICT [18], PROMISCUOUS [19], INDI [20] and Mantra [21], each has certain shortcomings, such as covering a limited collection of drug response microarray or only containing a computational framework. These shortcomings limit the accurate and scope of computational drug repurposing also increase the difficulties in using these data for scientists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators searching the CMap enter over-and underexpressed genes into the search engine, ranking chemotherapeutic agents on whether they regulate the same genes, either in an opposite or in similar fashion. The Mode of Action by NeTwoRk Analysis Mantra 2.0 database has clustered the CMap database and annotated the MoA of each compound, enabling determination of an unknown compound's MoA by referring to the neighbouring compounds in the network [58]. Connectivity mapping has been implemented for the TGGATEs data set in the liver toxicity map service; the Toxygates interface to the TG-GATEs data also enables ranking of compounds based on the genes that they regulate [54,57].…”
Section: Surveying the Landscape Of Databases For Cancer Biology And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Environmental Protection Agency aggregated computational toxicology resource (AcToR) database, PubChem and chEMBL databases as well as the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database connects chemicals with gene expression changes and disease or toxicity associations [50,52,56,59]. But the toxicology field would benefit from even further developed integrated tools such as the Mantra 2.0 or the cBio Cancer genomics portal that integrates gene expression information, genomic alterations, cancer survival analysis and antibody-based pathway assays from more than 20 different cancer types and 1000 cellular models [24,58]. The European SEURAT-1 (Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animal Testing 1) including the ToxBank consortium (www.toxbank.net) has created a cross-cluster data warehouse to facilitate storage and analysis of all data generated by the more than 70 research groups that form the SEURAT-1 cluster [28,53].…”
Section: Surveying the Landscape Of Databases For Cancer Biology And mentioning
confidence: 99%