“…2a) are comparable to those of other Cenozoic ultramafic xenoliths entrapped in basalts from French Massif Central (Zangana et al, 1999;Lenoir et al, 2000), Germany (Hartmann and Wedepohl, 1990;WittEickschen, 1993), Hungary (Downes et al, 1992), Romania (Vaselli et al, 1995), Russia (Ionov et al, 1995), Mongolia (Wiechert et al, 1997), China (Qi et al, 1995;Chen et al, 2001) and Canadian Cordillera (Peslier et al, 2002). When compared to xenoliths from different geodynamic settings, such as oceanic or continental environments (Canary Islands: Wulff-Pedersen et al, 1996;Neumann et al, 2002;Kerguelen Islands: Grégoire et al, 1997;Australia: O'Reilly and Griffin, 1988;Yaxley et al, 1991;Foden et al, 2002) or typical subduction zones (Marianas: Parkinson and Pearce, 1998;Papua New Guinea: Franz et al, 2002;Philippines: Maury et al, 1992), the VVP and French Massif Central, Germany, Hungary, Romania, Russia, China, Mongolia and Canadian Cordillera xenoliths display lower cr# values, while showing the same range of mg#, that are comparable to the primordial mantle values (Fig. 2a).…”