1998
DOI: 10.1029/97jb03509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mantle discontinuity structure beneath the Colorado Rocky Mountains and High Plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
126
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
126
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the same technique, measurements can differ for a single seismic station depending on back-azimuth (the direction to the earthquake from the receiver), because the structure may be different on one side of the station relative to the other (Dueker and Sheehan, 1998). Some studies stack receiver functions from all available back azimuths, a practice that tends to damp short-wavelength variations and likely underestimates the topographic variation (Lawrence and Shearer, 2006).…”
Section: Methodology For Seismic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the same technique, measurements can differ for a single seismic station depending on back-azimuth (the direction to the earthquake from the receiver), because the structure may be different on one side of the station relative to the other (Dueker and Sheehan, 1998). Some studies stack receiver functions from all available back azimuths, a practice that tends to damp short-wavelength variations and likely underestimates the topographic variation (Lawrence and Shearer, 2006).…”
Section: Methodology For Seismic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revenaugh and Jordan, 1991;Dueker and Sheehan, 1998;Deuss and Woodhouse, 2001), and no definitive physical or chemical explanation for its existence has been suggested. In the depth stacks determined here a small peak appears fairly consistently near 53.3 s, which corresponds to a depth of about 530 km.…”
Section: The 410 520 and 660 Km Discontinuitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the results from 2 ‡-and 1 ‡-radius bins and we chose 2 ‡ bins in order to maximize spatial coverage while maintaining signal quality. Receiver functions of P d s paths piercing the same bin at a given depth in the mantle were gathered and stacked [26,27] using an nth root (n = 2) stacking process [28]. The non-linear stacking process enhanced coherent signals and suppressed random noise.…”
Section: Data Processing and Signal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%