“…The Chesapeake Bay (including Virginia and Maryland), New England (including Maine and Massachusetts), and the Gulf of Mexico (including Alabama, Louisiana, and Texas) were grouped together due to lack of specificity in many abstracts in these regions, all others refer to the waters of individual states. biomechanics have used material testing to compare shark teeth performance (e.g., Whitenack and Motta, 2010) and vertebral strength (e.g., Porter et al, 2006) across multiple taxa, finite element analysis to study mechanical properties (e.g., Jayasankar et al, 2017), computational fluid dynamics (e.g., Divi et al, 2018), and computed tomography scanning (e.g., Kolmann et al, 2016). Although other research disciplines focused on nearshore species or species of high commercial interest, studies on functional morphology and biomechanics included studies on some of the clades most underrepresented in AES abstracts, particularly torpediniforms (e.g., Lesser Electric Ray, Narcine bancrofti Motta, 2004a, 2004b;Dean et al, 2006Dean et al, , 2008, torpedo rays [Lowe et al, 1994]), freshwater potamotrygonid rays (Kolmann et al, 2016), and less frequently studied species of orectolobiform sharks (Ramsay and Wilga, 2007;Motta et al, 2010).…”