2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-004-1166-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manometric evaluation of the intrathoracic stomach after gastric transposition in children

Abstract: Gastric transposition (GT) is one of the options for the esophageal replacement in children with esophageal atresia with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (EATEF). To date, no manometric studies have been conducted on the intrathoracic stomach after GT in EATEF patients; hence, this study was designed. Babies ( n=18) of EATEF who underwent esophageal replacement by GT were studied and manometry was correlated with the clinical outcome, age at surgery, and route of GT. The mean age at evaluation was 30.5 mon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean resting pressure in patients in whom gastric transposition was done in the neonatal period was 19.5 mm Hg [20]. The pH usually rises to 4 to 4.5 after vagotomy so was noted in most of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The mean resting pressure in patients in whom gastric transposition was done in the neonatal period was 19.5 mm Hg [20]. The pH usually rises to 4 to 4.5 after vagotomy so was noted in most of our patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There is evidence of swallow-related motor activity in the stomach after GPU, although a propagated antegrade propulsive peristalsis does not seem to be present [15]. Rather than a reservoir, the transposed stomach seems to act like a conduit with an extremely irregular biphasic emptying pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When using stomach, the same holds true [12]. Moreover, the bulkiness of the stomach may interfere with lung development, especially in infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%