2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2017.2771329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mano: A Wearable Hand Exoskeleton for Activities of Daily Living and Neurorehabilitation

Abstract: Abstract-Hand sensorimotor impairments are among the most common consequences of injuries affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems, leading to a drastic reduction in the quality of life for affected individuals. Combining wearable robotic exoskeletons and human-machine interfaces is a promising avenue for the restoration and substitution of lost and impaired functions for these users. In this study, we present a novel hand exoskeleton, mano, designed to assist and restore hand functions of people w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A third limitation, although not critical, concerns the limited accuracy and repeatability of hand movements generated by FES. A hand orthosis provides more controlled kinematics 62 and, thus, it would be interesting to explore the combination of hand orthosis and FES so as to evaluate whether a BCI that operates both together yields larger motor improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third limitation, although not critical, concerns the limited accuracy and repeatability of hand movements generated by FES. A hand orthosis provides more controlled kinematics 62 and, thus, it would be interesting to explore the combination of hand orthosis and FES so as to evaluate whether a BCI that operates both together yields larger motor improvements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this theory, with St-NMES guidance the descending and ascending motor pathways are both activated below the motor threshold, which might correspond to the physiological activation of the peripheral pathway during MI. As explained in [34] have shown that a robotic orthosis is more suitable than visual feedback to train motor imagery networks, whereas a passive movement of the joint will induce similar activation of motor networks [26,35] -but see [69] for a possible solution.…”
Section: Enhancement Of Kinesthetic Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Already several studies have implemented a somatosensory feedback to improve the discriminability of MI brain patterns. For instance, some authors used a robotic orthosis in order to induce a passive movement of the joint [25,26,27], a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to induce muscular contraction [28,29,30] or a vibrotactile stimulation that provides tactile afferences of the targeted limb [20,31,32,33]. The major conclusion of these experiments is that somatosensory feedback is more appropriate to enhance MI brain patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies, the specified torque is enough to apply HERO in ADLs and in clinical procedures with spastic stroke patients. This criterion was higher than those generally adopted in exoskeleton projects [34,35]. However, thorough analyzes still need to be done to assess the real force applied to the fingertips and to overcome spasticity in stroke patients.…”
Section: Mechanical Specifications Of Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 90%