2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mannose binding lectin gene 2 (rs1800450) missense variant may contribute to development and severity of COVID-19 infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
39
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
39
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We investigated the possible role of MBL2 genetic variants in determining susceptibility to severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure, by exploiting the statistical power provided by haplotype analysis. Surprisingly and in contrast with a previous study (Medetalibeyoglu et al, 2021), we found only a borderline correlation between one haplotype of the 6 SNPs associated with MBL levels and frequency of severe COVID-19 cases. However, we found a total of 7 significantly associated haplotypes, distributed along the MBL2 genomic region, often mapping in correspondence of regulatory elements (such as enhancers, promoter region, histone marks; Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We investigated the possible role of MBL2 genetic variants in determining susceptibility to severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure, by exploiting the statistical power provided by haplotype analysis. Surprisingly and in contrast with a previous study (Medetalibeyoglu et al, 2021), we found only a borderline correlation between one haplotype of the 6 SNPs associated with MBL levels and frequency of severe COVID-19 cases. However, we found a total of 7 significantly associated haplotypes, distributed along the MBL2 genomic region, often mapping in correspondence of regulatory elements (such as enhancers, promoter region, histone marks; Figure 6).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In SARS, conflicting results have been reported concerning the relevance of MBL2 genetic variants in this condition (Ip et al, 2005; Yuan et al, 2005; Zhang et al, 2005). In COVID-19, one MBL2 SNP has been associated with development and severity of the infection (Medetalibeyoglu et al, 2021). We investigated the possible role of MBL2 genetic variants in determining susceptibility to severe COVID-19 with respiratory failure, by exploiting the statistical power provided by haplotype analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Tu et al reported that the presence of the B allele of the MBL2 gene was significantly associated with an increased risk of SARS ( Tu et al, 2015 ), although in another study from Hong-Kong with 180 SARS patients, such an association was not confirmed ( Yuan et al, 2005 ). Considering COVID-19, Medetalibeyoglu et al recently reported that the presence of the B allele was significantly associated with a higher risk for severe disease and the need of ICU care ( Medetalibeyoglu et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the B allele of the MBL2 gene is the more common polymorphism affecting MBL serum levels in humans, leading several studies to focus solely in its study ( Medetalibeyoglu et al, 2021 , Tu et al, 2015 ). For example, while genetic MBL deficiency was not considered a major risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) ( Dahl and Nordestgaard, 2009 ), the presence of the deficiency-causing B allele has been associated with 4.9 times increased odds of hospital admission due to infection-induced COPD exacerbations bearing a worse outcome ( Lin et al, 2011 , Yang et al, 2003 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, false-negative nasopharyngeal tests for SARS-CoV-2 were frequently reported during the early phases of the pandemic [ 25 ]. Individual susceptibility factors to severe clinical course, including genetic polymorphisms that have a known relationship with COVID-19-related mortality [ 51 , 52 ], were not investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%