Often in the study of behavioral ecology, and more widely in science, we require to statistically test whether the central tendencies (mean or median) of 2 groups are different from each other on the basis of samples of the 2 groups. In surveying recent issues of Behavioral Ecology (Volume 16, issues 1-5), I found that, of the 130 papers, 33 (25%) used at least one statistical comparison of this sort. Three different tests were used to make this comparison: Student's t-test (67 occasions; 26 papers), Mann-Whitney U test (43 occasions; 21 papers), and the t-test for unequal variances (9 occasions; 4 papers). My aim in this forum article is to argue for the greater use of the last of these tests. The numbers just related suggest that this test is not commonly used. In my survey, I was able to identify tests described simply as ''t-tests'' with confidence as either a Student's t-test or an unequal variance t-test because the calculation of degrees of freedom from the 2 sample sizes is different for the 2 tests (see below). Hence, the neglect of the unequal variance t-test illustrated above is a real phenomenon and can be explained in several (nonexclusive ways) ways:1. Authors are unaware that Student's t-test is unreliable when variances differ between underlying populations. 2. Authors are aware of this but consider their samples to have similar variances. 3. Authors believe than the Mann-Whitney U test can effectively substitute for Student's t-test when variances are unequal. 4. Because the t distribution tends to the normal distribution for large sample sizes, authors may consider that their sample sizes are sufficiently large for concerns about unequal variance and nonnormality of the samples to be ignored. Argument 4 relies on the central limit theorem and would require a combined sample size of at least 30 (Sokal and Rohlf 1987, p. 107); however, in my survey, the majority (47 out of 61) of tests for which sample sizes were provided had a combined sample size below 30. The variances of the 2 samples are pooled in order to achieve the best estimate of the (assumed equal) variances of the 2 populations. Hence, we can see the need for the underlying assumption of equal population variances in this test. The Student's t-test performs badly when these variances are actually unequal, both in terms of Type I and Type II errors (Zar 1996). Figure 1 suggests that unequal sample variances are common in behavioral ecology. Although it is true that unequal variances are less problematic if sample sizes are similar, in practice, we often have quite unequal sample sizes (Figure 2). Hence, I suggest that the Student's t-test is frequently used in behavioral ecology when one of its important underlying assumptions is violated, and consequently, its performance is unreliable.The unequal variance t-test does not make the assumption of equal variances. Coombs et al. (1996) presented measured Type I errors obtained by simulated sampling from normal distributions for the Student's t-test and the unequal variance t-test (their r...