2001
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mann–Whitney U test when variances are unequal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…New sexuals were removed after eclosion. As the data were not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilks test, p!0.05) and variances were not homogeneous (Levene test, p!0.05), we used nonparametric median and sign tests (Kasuya 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New sexuals were removed after eclosion. As the data were not normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilks test, p!0.05) and variances were not homogeneous (Levene test, p!0.05), we used nonparametric median and sign tests (Kasuya 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between copepod toxin concentrations and differences between the ELISA and PP1 inhibition assays were tested with non-parametric tests, because the assumptions for the parametric tests were not met. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used because the variances were not different (Kasuya 2001). Statistical analyses were done with the Systat 8.0 version for Windows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argument 4 relies on the central limit theorem and would require a combined sample size of at least 30 (Sokal and Rohlf 1987, p. 107); however, in my survey, the majority (47 out of 61) of tests for which sample sizes were provided had a combined sample size below 30. The fallacy of argument 3 has been demonstrated previously on several occasions (e.g., Kasuya 2001;Neuhauser 2002 …”
mentioning
confidence: 92%