2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01028.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulation specific effects of mental fatigue: Evidence from novelty processing and simulated driving

Abstract: Mental fatigue has a wide range of effects on cognitive, behavioral, and motivational measures. It can be expected that specific effects in which fatigue becomes manifest is dependent on the nature of fatigue-inducing activity (e.g., level of control and working memory demands). This study examined how fatigue caused by tasks that differ on the level of working memory demands (0-Back, 2-Back) affects brain function (novelty processing, P3a) and performance (driving). Results showed that fatigue did not affect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The letters were presented randomly with a target rate of 25%. The n-back task has been used successfully in previous experiments to induce fatigue (Massar, Wester, Volkerts, & Kenemans, 2010). It is a cognitively demanding task that requires the sustained engagement of working memory and attention in order to uphold adequate levels of performance (Watter, Geffen, & Geffen, 2001).…”
Section: Stimuli and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The letters were presented randomly with a target rate of 25%. The n-back task has been used successfully in previous experiments to induce fatigue (Massar, Wester, Volkerts, & Kenemans, 2010). It is a cognitively demanding task that requires the sustained engagement of working memory and attention in order to uphold adequate levels of performance (Watter, Geffen, & Geffen, 2001).…”
Section: Stimuli and Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, declines in executive functions such as executive attention (van der Linden et al, 2003b;Holtzer et al, 2011), sustained attention (Dorrian et al, 2007;Langner et al, 2010;Lim et al, 2010), goal-directed attention , alternating attention (van der Linden et al, 2003a), divided attention (van der Linden and Eling, 2006), response inhibition (Kato et al, 2009), planning (Lorist et al, 2000;Lorist, 2008), and novelty processing (Massar et al, 2010) are a common feature of mental fatigue. Among the various components of executive function, selective attention, particularly conflict-controlling selective attention (response inhibition), is highly vulnerable to mental fatigue .…”
Section: Cognitive Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. We know of two studies: Boksem et al (2006) briefly mention the P3 but mainly focus on response-locked potentials (Ne/ERN), and Massar et al (2010) measure the more frontal P3a component, which is functionally different from the parietal P3b that we measure.…”
Section: Fatigue and Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%