2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-022-05030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulation of the thermal/mechanical properties of the fiber/polymer interface in PA6/epoxy composite via uniform/un-uniform colloidal stamping of silica/hollow graphene oxide nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to have an optimum polymer/NP interphase/adhesion region to overcome agglomeration, which is one of the major challenges in the homogenous dispersion of NPs in a polymer blend. Agglomeration not only affects the performance and mechanical properties, but weak adhesion between the polymer and the agglomerated NPs can lead to composite failure due to the concentration of exerted force on weak spots [ 100 , 101 , 102 ]. Ashraf et al showed that two grams of well dispersed and isolated 10 nm radius NPs can produce a remarkable interfacial area of 250 m 2 within a polymer matrix [ 103 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to have an optimum polymer/NP interphase/adhesion region to overcome agglomeration, which is one of the major challenges in the homogenous dispersion of NPs in a polymer blend. Agglomeration not only affects the performance and mechanical properties, but weak adhesion between the polymer and the agglomerated NPs can lead to composite failure due to the concentration of exerted force on weak spots [ 100 , 101 , 102 ]. Ashraf et al showed that two grams of well dispersed and isolated 10 nm radius NPs can produce a remarkable interfacial area of 250 m 2 within a polymer matrix [ 103 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] The direct impact of physical/mechanical characteristics of the polymer/particle interface is negligible in macro/micro-polymer composites because of the significantly small interface-to-particle size ratio. [15,16] On the other hand, it is reported that the thickness of the formed interphase cannot exceed several nanometers and accordingly, it is impossible to neglect the interfaceto-particle size ratio in polymer nanocomposites, including particles with a characteristic length of less than 100 nm. [17][18][19] This can be introduced as the main difference between the physical/mechanical characteristics of polymer micro/macro-composites and nanocomposites containing similar constituents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, Janus particles, characterized by the amphiphilic and asymmetric nature, [33,34] can synchronously achieve the high dispersion extent and the strong chemical linkage via modifying the organic segments (e. g., short carbon chains) on one side of nanofillers (especially for nanosheets) and the reactive functional groups on the other side, respectively. Although amphiphilic Janus nanosheets have been extensively used as compatibilizers up to date, to stabilize the immiscible blends of two different polymers, reduce their interfacial tensions and strengthen the interfacial interactions, [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] remarkably little is known about the effect of Janus nanosheets with dual functional groups on the mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. In particular, how Janus nanosheets modified with both short aliphatic chains and reactive functional groups affect the formation and property of nanosheet/epoxy nanocomposite is virtually unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%