1999
DOI: 10.3758/bf03201209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulation of familiarity reveals a necessary lexical component of the word-stem completion priming effect

Abstract: These experiments were motivated by the idea that many types of nondeclarative memory are byproducts arising from the plasticity that is inherent in much of the nervous system. We hypothesized that two types of repetition priming, word-stem completion (WSC)priming and perceptual identification (PI) priming, rely on different mechanisms because the WSC task and the PI task engage different cognitive and brain processes. Wetested this hypothesis by manipulating word familiarity. The results, impaired WSC priming… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion did not fit well with the conclusion drawn by several authors that priming in stem completion does depend, at least in part, on lexical processing (e.g., Postle & Corkin, 1999;Weldon, 1991;Wippich, 1995). Indeed, the dependence of priming on solutions in the present experiments was consistent with some level of lexical involvement.…”
Section: Priming Production Processes and Awarenesscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…This conclusion did not fit well with the conclusion drawn by several authors that priming in stem completion does depend, at least in part, on lexical processing (e.g., Postle & Corkin, 1999;Weldon, 1991;Wippich, 1995). Indeed, the dependence of priming on solutions in the present experiments was consistent with some level of lexical involvement.…”
Section: Priming Production Processes and Awarenesscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Recent studies have highlightedthe importance of word frequency (Postle & Corkin, 1999) and phonological processing (Rueckl & Mathew, 1999) in WSC. The present study extends these results, indicating that both factors independently contribute to the selection of a stem completion.…”
Section: Search and Selection In Explicit And Implicit Wscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…explicit word-stem completion performance in young, middle-aged, and older adults (Graf & Mandler, 1984;Nelson, Canas, Bajo, & Keelean, 1987;Postle & Corkin, 1999;Squire, Shimamura, & Graf, 1987; but see Roediger, Weldon, Stadler, & Riegler, 1992). The difference may be due to the prominent role of search and selection processes in WSC.…”
Section: Search and Selection Processes In Implicit Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a theoretical perspective, the evidence regarding the effects of word familiarity on implicit memory is limited and mixed. For example, Postle and Corkin (1999) found robust priming for both familiar, and unfamiliar words on a perceptual identification task, although priming was impaired for unfamiliar words on a word stem completion task. Similarly, McKone (1995) reported faster decay of implicit memory for pseudo (unfamiliar) words, than for familiar words (using lexical decision and naming tasks).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%