2018
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201807309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating Polysulfide Conversion with Strongly Coupled Fe3O4 and Nitrogen Doped Carbon for Stable and High Capacity Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract: Li–S batteries are among the most promising energy storage technologies but their commercialization faces substantial challenges, largely due to difficulties in controlling their reaction pathways under practical conditions. Here, the synthesis of strongly coupled Fe3O4 and N‐doped carbon directly in flexible carbon cloth is demonstrated, as well as their novel use for hosting sulfur with outstanding performance for Li–S batteries. It is discovered that the synergistic effects of Fe3O4 and N‐carbon bring stron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Against this background, for an anticipant cathode of Na‐S batteries, the sulfur host needs to meet the following requirements generally to alleviate the performance deterioration: first, the host should possess desirable electronic conductivity to counteract that of S; besides, abundant pore structure or hollow structure is needed to buffer the volume expansion of S and physically restrict the shuttle of polysulfide; finally, as proved by reported literatures that the polar material with intrinsic sulfiphilic property is necessary because of the excellent chemical adsorption for soluble polysulfide. Therefore, several homologous hosts have been explored to improve the electrochemical performances of RT Na‐S and Li‐S batteries, such as heteroatom‐doped porous carbon, metal oxides (TiO 2, MnO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 ), and metal sulfides (FeS 2 , Co 9 S 8 ) . But anyway, the adsorption of the polar surface for polysulfide is insufficient, and thus the shuttle effect of sodium polysulfide still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Against this background, for an anticipant cathode of Na‐S batteries, the sulfur host needs to meet the following requirements generally to alleviate the performance deterioration: first, the host should possess desirable electronic conductivity to counteract that of S; besides, abundant pore structure or hollow structure is needed to buffer the volume expansion of S and physically restrict the shuttle of polysulfide; finally, as proved by reported literatures that the polar material with intrinsic sulfiphilic property is necessary because of the excellent chemical adsorption for soluble polysulfide. Therefore, several homologous hosts have been explored to improve the electrochemical performances of RT Na‐S and Li‐S batteries, such as heteroatom‐doped porous carbon, metal oxides (TiO 2, MnO 2 , Fe 3 O 4 ), and metal sulfides (FeS 2 , Co 9 S 8 ) . But anyway, the adsorption of the polar surface for polysulfide is insufficient, and thus the shuttle effect of sodium polysulfide still exists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lowest capacity decay rate and the highest discharge specific capacity were obtained at a current density of 200 mA g −1 ; as the specific current was increased stepwise from 200 to 400, 600, 800, 1000, 2000 and 3000 mA g −1 , the capacities after 200 cycles were 1480.1, 1186.4, 9846, 791.1, 703.1, 587.1 and 451.3 mAh g −1 , respectively. These results indicate that the micro/nanostructured Si@SnS 2 ‐rGO composite exhibits an efficient lithium ion storage performance …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The voltage ranged from −0.8 to 0.8 V with a scanning rate of 20 mV s −1 . As shown in the Figure e, compared with the battery with CNTO, the battery with Fe 3 O 4 @C/CNTO exhibits higher current illustrating the rapid conversion of LiPSs on the electrode . Figure f is the 3 th cycle discharge/charge profiles of the battery with Fe 3 O 4 @C/CNTO and CNTO under the current of 0.2 C. The battery with Fe 3 O 4 @C/CNTO shows a higher specific capacity of 1155 mA h g −1 than the CNTO sample of 1030 mA h g −1 , demonstrating the improvement of sulfur utilization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%