“…Despite the progress made in advancing the performance of the solar evaporators, the solar evaporation rates of these materials are limited to 1.47 kg m −2 h −1 (KMH) under a solar flux of 1-Sun due to the relatively high intrinsic energy demand for water evaporation (>40 kJ mol −1 ). [23,333] Hydrogel-based solar evaporators have been developed using a range of synthetic polymers (e.g., PAM, PSA, poly(sodium p-styrenesulfonate), polyhydroxypropyl acrylate, PVA, PILs) [42,53,87,88,97,132,334,335] and natural polymers (e.g., agarose, cellulose, konjac glucomannan, carboxymethylcellulose, alginate, chitosan) [311,312,332,[336][337][338][339] incorporated with solar absorbers such as CNTs, [87,101,333,340] graphene/graphite, [97,341] plasmonic nanoparticles, [338] metal organic frameworks, [337] poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), [334] PANI, [42,342] PPy, [21,99] rGO, [312] Mxene, [86] Ti 2 O 3 , [343] MoS 2 , [344] CuS, [336] and carbon black particles [313] among others. As will be discussed in detail below, compared to conventional solar evaporators, hydrogels generally show better solar evaporation efficiency due to their: i) hydrophilicity, ii) tailorable pore structures, ii) presence of bound water, and iii) presence of abundant functionalities that engender improved water transport, efficient utilization of heat generated, mitigation of salt scaling, and impartment of multifunctionalities (Fi...…”