2022
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202110846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manipulating Interfacial Thermal Conduction of 2D Janus Heterostructure via a Thermo‐Mechanical Coupling

Abstract: 2D Janus transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) semiconductor materials have attracted great interest for their potential applications. Because of the increased requirement for thermal management in 2D devices with single‐atom thickness, a fundamental understanding of interfacial thermal conduction (ITC) has emerging significance. In this work, the ITC of in‐plane heterostructures constructed using MoSSe and WSSe is reported. In addition to the interface connected normally by MoSSe and WSSe with the same type o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1(a and b), the bond lengths of Mo–S, Mo–Se, W–S, and W–Se in the Janus MoSSe and WSSe monolayers are 2.41 Å, 2.53 Å, 2.43 Å, and 2.54 Å, respectively, while the thicknesses of the MoSSe and WSSe monolayers are 3.24 Å and 3.23 Å, respectively, which are adopted from previous DFT calculation work. 37 All of them agree well with the reported experimental and DFT calculation results. 4 Then, to establish a linear temperature profile along the x -direction, the simulated systems are divided into 25 slabs where the 1st and 25th are fixed to simulated adiabatic walls, while the remaining 23 slabs are equidistant.…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1(a and b), the bond lengths of Mo–S, Mo–Se, W–S, and W–Se in the Janus MoSSe and WSSe monolayers are 2.41 Å, 2.53 Å, 2.43 Å, and 2.54 Å, respectively, while the thicknesses of the MoSSe and WSSe monolayers are 3.24 Å and 3.23 Å, respectively, which are adopted from previous DFT calculation work. 37 All of them agree well with the reported experimental and DFT calculation results. 4 Then, to establish a linear temperature profile along the x -direction, the simulated systems are divided into 25 slabs where the 1st and 25th are fixed to simulated adiabatic walls, while the remaining 23 slabs are equidistant.…”
Section: Simulation Model and Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Graphenes are considered as the horizon of two-dimensional (2D) materials, as they inspire intense research activity on 2D layered materials, 1,2 which have fantastic mechanical, [3][4][5] electronic, 6 thermal [7][8][9][10] and magnetic 11 properties. The Dirac cone in graphenes induces ultrafast dynamics for the charge carrier, but their zero bandgap characteristics also impede some applications in field-effect transistors, impelling the further investigation of other 2D semiconductor materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, type-I heterostructures also show considerable optical performances as photocatalysts ( Ren et al, 2021c , 2021d ; Zhu et al, 2021 ). Recently, TMD materials are widely studied because of their intriguing electronic ( Shen et al, 2022 ), thermal ( Ren et al, 2022 ), and optical ( Luo et al, 2019 ) properties. The TMD materials also can be prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) growth method ( Wang et al, 2015 ; Tan et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%