2013
DOI: 10.1086/673528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manioc Varietal Diversity, Social Networks, and Distribution Constraints in Rural Amazonia

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. The University of Chicago Press and Wenner-Gren Foundation for AnthropologicalResearch are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Current Anthropo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
28
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The climate on Mota Lava is drier, and thus the plants that migrants brought with them may not all have been suited to Vanua Lava's climate and soils. Nonetheless, unexpectedly, no correlation was found between out-degree and crop diversity (data not shown), similar to the results reported by Kawa et al (2013). These findings differ from those of other published studies that show a positive correlation between centrality and crop diversity Coomes 2004, Calvet-Mir et al 2012a).…”
Section: Specificities Of Plant Circulation Networksupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The climate on Mota Lava is drier, and thus the plants that migrants brought with them may not all have been suited to Vanua Lava's climate and soils. Nonetheless, unexpectedly, no correlation was found between out-degree and crop diversity (data not shown), similar to the results reported by Kawa et al (2013). These findings differ from those of other published studies that show a positive correlation between centrality and crop diversity Coomes 2004, Calvet-Mir et al 2012a).…”
Section: Specificities Of Plant Circulation Networksupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Using network descriptors such as degree-centrality, researchers have attempted to measure the popularity of farmers by their degree, i.e., the number of times an individual is mentioned as a seed exchange partner (CalvetMir et al 2012a, Kawa et al 2013, Reyes-García et al 2013, Poudel et al 2015, Ricciardi 2015. In the case of oriented networks, it is possible to distinguish between the centrality of individuals as receivers and as givers by examining in-degree and out-degree statistics, respectively.…”
Section: Popularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers interested in networks in farming communities have relied on synchronic approaches, whether their studies concern the investigation of local ecological knowledge and expertise (Atran et al 2002, Isaac et al 2007) or more recently, seed exchanges (Abay et al 2011, Calvet-Mir et al 2012, Kawa et al 2013, Reyes-Garcia et al 2013. Such networks are established either through snapshot surveys of transactions at a given time or through the assessment of all the exchanges that occurred along the life span of individuals without taking into account their dynamic processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a much finer scale, household-level properties and individual characteristics have also been explored to uncover differential patterns of seed seeking and seed provisioning behaviors within communities. Studies have shown that gender (Zimmerer 2003, Ban and Coomes 2004, Chambers and Brush 2010, Ricciardi 2015, age (Alvarez et al 2005), farmer expertise (Subedi et al 2003, Calvet-Mir et al 2012, Kawa et al 2013, Reyes-García et al 2013, richness of crop diversity (Ban and Coomes 2004, Alvarez et al 2005, Calvet-Mir et al 2012, Reyes-García et al 2013, and household socioeconomic status (Louette et al 1997, Alvarez et al 2005, Nagarajan et al 2007, van Etten and de Bruin 2007, McGuire 2008, Stromberg et al 2010, Rana et al 2011, Samberg et al 2013, Poudel et al 2015 are important factors in understanding the structure of seed circulation networks. Of particular interest for our case study are those dimensions related to household socioeconomic status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%