2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-005-0349-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manifolds with Poly-Surface Fundamental Groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(one applies among others: π 3 (D ′ ) = π 3 (D) = 0 and the Hurewicz theorem). The obstruction in Z ⊗ Λ π 3 (P ′ ) is given by the image of [h (3) • ϕ] ∈ π 3 (K ′ ) under the composite map…”
Section: A General Results On the Uniqueness Of Strongly Minimal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(one applies among others: π 3 (D ′ ) = π 3 (D) = 0 and the Hurewicz theorem). The obstruction in Z ⊗ Λ π 3 (P ′ ) is given by the image of [h (3) • ϕ] ∈ π 3 (K ′ ) under the composite map…”
Section: A General Results On the Uniqueness Of Strongly Minimal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the example F × S 2 there are two models, namely, F × S 2 and the non-trivial S 2 -bundle E → F with second Stiefel-Whitney class = 0 (see, for example, [3], Appendix). Here it is also convenient to consider the map respectively (see [3]). It is shown in [9], Section 5, that F × S 2 and E are the only models up to homotopy equivalence.…”
Section: (42) Construction Of Strongly Minimal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the above differential is surjective onto the H 3 (B; Z/2). Therefore, on the line p + q = 4, the groups which survive to E ∞ are Z in (0, 4 …”
Section: Spin Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We combine the approach of [15], involving bordism techniques and the modified surgery theory of Kreck [18], with the minimal models of Hillman [12] to obtain the following result (we use the notion of w 2 -type, which is recalled in Definition 4.1 below). Theorem B is also stated in [4] (see also [10]), but our proof is primarily based on understanding homotopy selfequivalences, and this technique may have other applications. Note that E • (B) is not path connected, in fact π 0 (E • (B)) = Aut • (B).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…By a result of J. Hillman [Hil91, Lemma 6] for closed, aspherical surface bundles over surfaces, condition (iii) is satisfied. Indeed, the Mayer-Vietoris argument extends to compact, aspherical surfaces with boundary: each circle C j in the connected-decomposition of the aspherical surface Σ b i = F 1 # · · · #F r generates an indivisible element in the free fundamental group of the many-punctured torus or Klein bottle F k , hence each inclusion π 1 (C j ) → π 1 (F k ) of fundamental groups is square-root closed (see [CHS06,Thm. 2.4] for detail).…”
Section: Five-dimensional Assembly On 4-manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%