Manifestations of intelligence: Expanding the measurement space to reconsider specific cognitive abilities

Multiple test batteries as predictors for pilot performance: A meta‐analytic investigation

“…Taken together, the role of criterion type in validation studies was evidenced to be crucial. Our results support the necessity to balance predictor‐criterion relations such that broader predictors are matched with broader criteria and specific predictors are matched with specific criteria (Ones & Viswesvaran, ; Reeve et al, ).…”

“…This study responds to the call for industrial and organizational psychology researchers to reconnect with the science of mental abilities and measurement theory in order to gain a better understanding of how constructs within the intelligence nexus manifest in the context of work (Reeve, Scherbaum, & Goldstein, 2015). To achieve the objectives of this study, a functional approach was used for classifying TBs.…”

Do your high potentials have potential? The impact of individual differences and designation on leader success

“…Decision making and strategic thinking are common to many current models of potential in the public domain (Silzer & Church, ), and both are likely to be highly relevant to leadership potential generally. Newer intelligence theories go beyond g to look at more specific abilities and that even high cognitive ability within individuals may “tilt” more toward some specific abilities (Reeve, Scherbaum, & Goldstein, ).…”

There Are More Things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, Than DGF

“…As has been argued elsewhere (e.g., Lievens & Reeve, 2012;Reeve, Scherbaum, & Goldstein, 2015), this position is not helpful to either science or practice that is aimed at understanding the manifestation of individual differences in the workplace. As they note, "analyses that fail to seek DGFs support the myth of the importance of narrow constructs com-pared with more general constructs" (p. 17).…”