2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manganese and limestone interactions during mine water treatment

Abstract: Manganese removal from mining-affected waters is an important challenge for the mining industry. Addressed herein is this issue in both batch and continuous conditions. Batch experiments were carried out with synthetic solutions, at 23+/-2 degrees C, initial pH 5.5 and 8.3 g limestone/L. Similarly, continuous tests were performed with a 16.5 mg/L Mn(2+) mine water, at 23 degrees C, initial pH 8.0 and 20.8 g limestone/L. Calcite limestone gave the best results and its fine grinding proved to the most effective … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the removal of 16.5 mg/L Mn(II) from acidic mining wastewaters was difficult and required an initial pH value of 8.0 and a larger limestone dose (16.7 g/L), probably due to the adverse effect of calcium (Ca) sulfate coating on the limestone [43].…”
Section: Chemical Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the removal of 16.5 mg/L Mn(II) from acidic mining wastewaters was difficult and required an initial pH value of 8.0 and a larger limestone dose (16.7 g/L), probably due to the adverse effect of calcium (Ca) sulfate coating on the limestone [43].…”
Section: Chemical Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the limestone, dolomite, magnesite, and quartzite can be used to precipitate Mn from mine wastewater. Soluble carbonate can be added if the solution alkalinity is not high enough for precipitation [40,43].…”
Section: Chemical Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, most Mn(II) was removed by hydrolysis as pH increased even though more complexed reactions such as sorption and coprecipitation by (Table 1). As a comparable study, Silva et al [38] conducted batch tests of Mn(II) removal by fine particles (<45 lm) of limestone or dolomite in synthetic solution. Their results revealed that Mn(II) removal capacities of limestone and dolomite were about 7.2 mg (g of limestone) À1 and 1.5 mg (g of dolomite) À1 , respectively.…”
Section: Estimation Of Mn(ii) Removal Rates and Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current article focuses on the synthetic wastewaters emulating from real wastewaters containing high amounts of manganese and low heavy metals concentration generated by metal coating plants, electrolytic metal manganese residue leachate and mining activities …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%