2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular sexual dimorphism analysis in CBCT scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
40
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
5
40
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study BG presented the greatest AUC and the best balance between sensitivity and specificity, corroborating previous studies in Brazilian populations (Gamba et al, 2016;Lopez-Capp et al, 2018). The mean values found for BG in the present study were similar to those found for individuals from Northern Thailand (Ongkana & Sudwan) and for Black South Africans (Dayal et al) (Table VI).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study BG presented the greatest AUC and the best balance between sensitivity and specificity, corroborating previous studies in Brazilian populations (Gamba et al, 2016;Lopez-Capp et al, 2018). The mean values found for BG in the present study were similar to those found for individuals from Northern Thailand (Ongkana & Sudwan) and for Black South Africans (Dayal et al) (Table VI).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the present study, the female angle of mandible was observed to be greater than male. However, Ayoub et al (2009) and Gamba et al (2016) reported that males had a greater angle of mandible than their counterparts in Lebanese and Brazilian populations, respectively (Table IV). This study reported no statistically significant correlation between the angle of mandible and sex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies that used the mandible evaluated various mandibular traits and assessed their validity for use as sex identifiers. Morphometric measurements made on dry mandibles (Ongkana & Sudwan, 2009;Vinay et al, 2013;Datta et al, 2015) or on orthopantomographs (OPT) (Indira et al, 2012) or on mandibular images obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (Gamba et al, 2016) revealed that osteometric parameters that included ramus height and breadth, coronoid height, mandibular length, bigonial breadth, and bicondylar breadth showed significant Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. This work was carried out during a sabbatical year in Florida, USA and was supported by the University of Jordan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%