2014
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular Ridge Expansion Using a Horizontal Bone-Splitting Technique and Synthetic Bone Substitute: An Alternative to Bone Block Grafting?

Abstract: This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
2
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the significant loss of alveolar bone additionally surgical procedures are necessary [2]. Augmentation of the resorbed alveolar crest can be achieved, for example, with onlay bone grafts, membrane techniques, bone distraction, and ridge splitting [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the significant loss of alveolar bone additionally surgical procedures are necessary [2]. Augmentation of the resorbed alveolar crest can be achieved, for example, with onlay bone grafts, membrane techniques, bone distraction, and ridge splitting [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gap filling may or may not influence the final outcome of implant success [24, 25] however, since the graft material takes part in the bone remodelling process, it expedites the healing process. Ella et al [26] advocated the use of bone filling substitutes, especially in the horizontally expanded sites as it resulted in reduced resorption around the implant bony walls. The direct contact between the bone walls and implant is reduced with bone substitutes acting as a cushion against ischaemic resorption with some gain in bone volume.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As original the method is described with immediate implant placement (1). Some authors perform this method only in the upper jaw (2,3,4), others -only in the mandible (5,6), as the majority of the publications describe its performance in the both jaws (7,8 ). The space between the two plates is filled with bonegrafting material, as some authors recommend the use of barrier membrane (9,4), which covers them.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%