2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1073/2/022004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular ramus thickness based on cone beam computed tomography scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that the patients' age has no influence on the mean bone thickness of the ramus, which confirms the results of Chrcanovic et al [5] and Susilo et al [4] Zhou et al showed that there is no significant difference in the gonion angle between men and women [12], which is consistent with our data. According to that study "the mean mandibular angle was 125.1°in males and 124.1°in females " [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results showed that the patients' age has no influence on the mean bone thickness of the ramus, which confirms the results of Chrcanovic et al [5] and Susilo et al [4] Zhou et al showed that there is no significant difference in the gonion angle between men and women [12], which is consistent with our data. According to that study "the mean mandibular angle was 125.1°in males and 124.1°in females " [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Susilo et al [4], Chrcanovic et al [5] and Scomparin et al [16] found no significant sex difference in the mandibular bone thickness, which corresponds with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations