2021
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_158_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular implant-supported overdenture: A systematic review and meta-analysis for optimum selection of attachment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More space is often required compared to locator attachments [29]. These two kinds of attachment systems are usually used to compensate for the angle of the implant [30]. Furthermore, the deeper attachment space of overdentures is often designed to correspond to a higher bar in the oral cavity, which is decided upon according to the vertical occlusal dimension (VOD) for each patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More space is often required compared to locator attachments [29]. These two kinds of attachment systems are usually used to compensate for the angle of the implant [30]. Furthermore, the deeper attachment space of overdentures is often designed to correspond to a higher bar in the oral cavity, which is decided upon according to the vertical occlusal dimension (VOD) for each patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4 software and Stata 15.0 software with standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) representing continuous variables, and relative risk (RR) representing dichotomous variables ( 26 ). The I 2 statistic was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the included studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O sistema de retenção escolhido foi o do tipo o'ring, pois possui boa distribuição das cargas mastigatórias, agredindo menos os tecidos periodontal e peri-implantar, além disso possui boa retenção, estabilidade e facilidade na higienização, sendo bem aceito pelos pacientes. No entanto, esse sistema de retenção necessita de manutenções periódicas, e de um espaço mínimo entre a borda incisal mandibular e mucosa de 10 a 12 mm para fixação do componente macho, o que estava presente no caso exposto 16 .…”
Section: Discussâounclassified