2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.revsto.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular angle resection and masticatory muscle hypertrophy – A technical note and morphological optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Therefore, the LS will protrude further, as the volume of the masseter on the LS remains large even postoperatively, and thus the face will appear wider on the LS. Therefore, in orthognathic surgery addressing the asymmetry of the masticatory muscles, surgical approaches, [15][16][17] such as masseter resection, should performed in addition to the orthognathic surgery, or botulinum toxin A should be injected directly into the muscle to reduce the masseter mass. 18,19 The muscle asymmetry in the patients in this study is considered to be due to asymmetry of the mandible, as it causes differences in the distance that the muscles on the two sides must move, and differences in the force applied to the bilateral muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Therefore, the LS will protrude further, as the volume of the masseter on the LS remains large even postoperatively, and thus the face will appear wider on the LS. Therefore, in orthognathic surgery addressing the asymmetry of the masticatory muscles, surgical approaches, [15][16][17] such as masseter resection, should performed in addition to the orthognathic surgery, or botulinum toxin A should be injected directly into the muscle to reduce the masseter mass. 18,19 The muscle asymmetry in the patients in this study is considered to be due to asymmetry of the mandible, as it causes differences in the distance that the muscles on the two sides must move, and differences in the force applied to the bilateral muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After applying the study criteria, 27 publications were excluded because of other associated surgical procedures ( 9 - 12 ), other therapeutic applications of BFP ( 2 , 13 - 15 ), technical notes ( 4 , 16 - 24 ), studies with less than 10 patients ( 7 , 25 ), case report ( 26 , 27 ), article reviews ( 28 - 30 ), and absence of the outcomes of interest ( 31 , 32 ), respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature reports quote 2 disadvantages of the extraoral approach for debulking the hypertrophied masseter and osteoplasty of the mandibular angle, namely, the creation of a surgical scar and the risk of possible injury to the marginal mandibular division of the facial nerve. 15,16 Both are probable complications of the surgical technique described. Nevertheless, there are also several advantages of this approach, such as wide local access and clear visualization of the surgical field, precise transection of the required and predetermined amount of muscle tissue from the planned location, ease in shaping and contouring of the angle, and reduced risk of inadvertent injury to the facial vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%