Leadership 2007
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvpg85tk.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Your Boss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is encouraged to ensure that management frameworks are not being used incorrectly. Moreover, research should investigate how leadership styles (Gabarro & Kotter, 2005;Goleman, 2000;Goleman et al, 2013;Shuibo & Tianbing, 2011), top management characteristics, and CEO profiles (Chatterjee & Hambrick, 2007;Chen et al, 2015;Galasso & Simcoe, 2011;Goel & Thakor, 2008;Mackey, 2008) explain KDMs' behavior, especially concerning VCW phases 1, 3, and 5.…”
Section: Discussion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is encouraged to ensure that management frameworks are not being used incorrectly. Moreover, research should investigate how leadership styles (Gabarro & Kotter, 2005;Goleman, 2000;Goleman et al, 2013;Shuibo & Tianbing, 2011), top management characteristics, and CEO profiles (Chatterjee & Hambrick, 2007;Chen et al, 2015;Galasso & Simcoe, 2011;Goel & Thakor, 2008;Mackey, 2008) explain KDMs' behavior, especially concerning VCW phases 1, 3, and 5.…”
Section: Discussion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not use "employer" to denote an organization, which besides being a conceptually problematic locus of loyalty behaviors, is also ontologically problematic as a moral agent. While it is true that an employee's supervisor does not always have sole decision rights over the employment relationship (because the right to terminate such a relationship may also be held, sometimes exclusively, by human resources staff or by higher-level managers), because of the supervisor's prerogatives to assign privileges and duties, rewards and punishments, praise or blame, that supervisor is generally the single most important determinant of the employee's relationship with the organization as a whole (Barnard, 1938;Gabarro & Kotter, 1980;Mintzberg, 1973).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le management par objectif s"inscrit dans le même univers (« management by objectives », Drucker, 1954 ;pour une synthèse, voir McConkie, 1979 (Fayol, 1916) -"Management by objectives" (Drucker, 1954) -Activité quotidienne du manager (Mintzberg, 1984 ;Martinko & Gardner, 1990, Tenglad, 2006 Relation managériale zélée : être ou donner l'image du "bon élève" -"Managing your boss" (Gabarro et Kotter, 1980) -Théorie LMX (Graen et Uhl-Bien, 1995) -Management des impressions (Gardner et Martinko, 1988), stratégies d'influence (Kipnis et al, 1980) Relation managériale opportuniste -Une sous-spécification des mandats stratégique (Hendry, 2002 ;Jackall, 1988) Relation managériale ambiguë, à construire -Attentes floues (Watson et Harris, 1999) et contradictoires (Tsui et al, 1995) -Interprétation des jugements (Laroche, 2001), négociation sur le travail (Hales, 1986), "shared meaning" (Ferris et al, 1994) -Problèmes abordés : "issue selling", promoteur du changement, fabricant de stratégie (Strategy as Practice)…”
Section: La Relation Managériale Traditionnelleunclassified
“…Dans ce cas, le manager peut aider son supérieur à la rendre plus fonctionnelle. C"est ce que Gabarro et Kotter (1980) (Dionne, 2004). Cette théorie se fonde sur la dyade (ce qui est rare) en reconnaissant que la relation entre un supérieur et son subordonné est unique :…”
Section: La Relation Managériale Zélée : êTre Un « Bon éLève » Ou Cheunclassified