2016
DOI: 10.1108/er-03-2015-0054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing workplace religious expression within the legal constraints

Abstract: Purpose\ud – The purpose of this paper is to consider in broad terms how employers may respond to different forms of religious expression by employees in the workplace, within the discretion afforded to them by law.\ud \ud Design/methodology/approach\ud – Through a discussion of relevant legislation and case law, and a review of relevant literature, it seeks to identify the legal constraints within which employers must operate when determining policy and practice in this area and gives consideration to how the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While this study is conducted in France with its unique characteristics, we argue that our findings may also have broader implications as France shares some legal underpinnings with other EU members such as the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as the Equal Treatment Framework Directive which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion and beliefs in the EU (Hambler, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While this study is conducted in France with its unique characteristics, we argue that our findings may also have broader implications as France shares some legal underpinnings with other EU members such as the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as well as the Equal Treatment Framework Directive which prohibits discrimination on the grounds of religion and beliefs in the EU (Hambler, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While European countries do not have the obligation to reasonably accommodate for religion or belief, many managers actually do provide accommodations (Bader et al , 2013) especially since many accommodations are relatively minor (Galindo and Zannad, 2012). Indeed, religious diversity may lead individual workers to ask for specific workplace accommodations related to prayer, religious celebrations and dress code (Hambler, 2016; Howard, 2012). However, there are restrictions to the right to express one’s religious beliefs freely under the condition that they are “justified by the nature of the task to be performed and proportionate to the intended purpose.” It is important to acknowledge differences between European Union (EU) member states when it comes to tolerating, accepting or accommodating religious dress, holidays or other practices of religiously observant employees (Alidadi et al , 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Religious bullying can be manifested in different identities. Suppose an employee working in a non-native organization in a foreign country may perceive harassment based on national origin, gender, ethnicity, and religion (Bene􀅫iel, Fry, & Geigle, 2014;Hambler, 2016). Religious harassment can emerge from various motivational bases and power reliance relations.…”
Section: Religious Harassment As a Mediatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review is based on “Managing workplace religious expression within the legal constraints” by Hambler (2016). The author provides a balanced account for and against religious expression at work.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%