2010
DOI: 10.2166/wh.2010.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform

Abstract: Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) rules implemented under the Clean Water Act require certain IFAP operations to adopt measures to reduce nutrient pollution, such as by controlling manure runoff (27). The effectiveness of the CAFO rules, however, has been severely constrained by a lack of authority to mandate compliance (24), the limited capacity of the EPA to oversee state programs (57), and exemptions made for runoff during storms (when much of the pollution occurs) (194). Furthermore, as a result of industry pressure to weaken the scope of CAFO rules, they apply only to the largest operations, and do not regulate heavy metals, pathogens, antibiotics, or contaminants other than nutrients (57).…”
Section: Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) rules implemented under the Clean Water Act require certain IFAP operations to adopt measures to reduce nutrient pollution, such as by controlling manure runoff (27). The effectiveness of the CAFO rules, however, has been severely constrained by a lack of authority to mandate compliance (24), the limited capacity of the EPA to oversee state programs (57), and exemptions made for runoff during storms (when much of the pollution occurs) (194). Furthermore, as a result of industry pressure to weaken the scope of CAFO rules, they apply only to the largest operations, and do not regulate heavy metals, pathogens, antibiotics, or contaminants other than nutrients (57).…”
Section: Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the CAFO rules, however, has been severely constrained by a lack of authority to mandate compliance (24), the limited capacity of the EPA to oversee state programs (57), and exemptions made for runoff during storms (when much of the pollution occurs) (194). Furthermore, as a result of industry pressure to weaken the scope of CAFO rules, they apply only to the largest operations, and do not regulate heavy metals, pathogens, antibiotics, or contaminants other than nutrients (57). Air pollutants and odors from agricultural activities, with a few exceptions, remain exempt from federal (Clean Air Act) and state air-quality standards (194).…”
Section: Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike human biosolids, no treatment is required prior to discharge of animal wastes, which are almost entirely (>90%) disposed of onto land (Graham and Nachman, 2010). Storage of poultry house litter or of swine waste, without specific composting procedures, does not reduce the burden of pathogens and AMR determinants (Gerba and Smith, 2005; Graham et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Animal Wastes: the Connector Between The Gut Microbiome Of Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the industrial poultry house often is assumed to be biocontained and biosecure, multiple pathways connect it with surrounding ecosystems . These are ventilation systems required to keep crowded animals alive; movement of rodents (Henzler and Opitz 1992), wild birds (Leibler et al 2009), and insects ) in and out of confinement facilities; and transfer of wastes Graham and Nachman 2010). These conditions release viable bacteria and ARGs into surrounding environments, water systems, and wild animal reservoirs Chee-Sanford et al 2009;Baquero et al 2008;Silbergeld et al 2008).…”
Section: Farms: Spread Of Antibiotic Resistance Genes In the Food Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of litter onto open fields can impact the soil microbiome locally to regionally through run-off and air-borne drift. The USA has no regulatory requirements for treating animal wastes, leading to uncontrolled waste storage before land disposal Graham and Nachman 2010). Simple storage methods do not affect prevalence of pathogens nor drug-resistant pathogens ).…”
Section: Farms: Spread Of Antibiotic Resistance Genes In the Food Chainmentioning
confidence: 99%