2018
DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing urban flood risk in Blue‐Green cities: The Clean Water for All initiative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar concepts have influenced Asia-Pacific cities, such as the "Active Beautiful and Clean Waters" (ABC) programme initiated in Singapore in the mid-2000s, which aims to promote more active, beautiful, and clean-living environments for the public using "Blue-Green Infrastructure" (BGI) measures [36]. In the early 2010s, several UK cities stated the aspiration to become a "Blue-Green City" (BGC) [37], which is a city that aims to recreate a more naturally oriented water cycle in its urban environment by merging its management of the urban water cycle with its management of public green spaces and corridors [38]. Knowledge gained about urban planning and urban water management through these practices creates a solid foundation for the adoption of NBS within the SCP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar concepts have influenced Asia-Pacific cities, such as the "Active Beautiful and Clean Waters" (ABC) programme initiated in Singapore in the mid-2000s, which aims to promote more active, beautiful, and clean-living environments for the public using "Blue-Green Infrastructure" (BGI) measures [36]. In the early 2010s, several UK cities stated the aspiration to become a "Blue-Green City" (BGC) [37], which is a city that aims to recreate a more naturally oriented water cycle in its urban environment by merging its management of the urban water cycle with its management of public green spaces and corridors [38]. Knowledge gained about urban planning and urban water management through these practices creates a solid foundation for the adoption of NBS within the SCP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both WSUD and BGI concepts emphasize the value in the connection and interaction of blue and green components, encouraging networks of interconnected BGI assets that can manage, treat and convey runoff and potential flood waters, while also maximizing the development of wider benefits [5,11]. Recent work has shown that provision of these multiple benefits is often interlinked, and it is, therefore, important to consider them in concert [5,12]. For example, through integrating BGI into the wider urban environment, it is possible not only to alleviate the flood risk, increase flood resilience and improve water quality of runoff but also to improve habitat and connect with wildlife corridors through urban landscapes [5,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a wide range of mitigation measures (Table 8.1). There are three main types: (1) property-level flood risk adaptation, (2) nature-based solutions and (3) engineering solutions (O'Donnell et al, 2019;Attems et al, 2020;Patt and Jüpner, 2020; also see Chapter 3 and Chapter 5 in this volume). Each entails varying costs and effectiveness for flood risk reduction.…”
Section: Mitigation Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%