Managing triadic supplier relationships in collaborative innovation projects: a relational view perspective

Abstract

Purpose Suppliers are essential partners in innovation projects, as they own resources, knowledge assets and capabilities that complement those of buying firms. In today’s competitive environment, firms may choose to collaborate with suppliers beyond dyads, forming triadic or three-party relationships. Using the theoretical lens of the relational view (RV), this study aims to explore what type of triad configurations firms use to govern supplier relationships in collaborative innovation projects, how they choose to share resources and implications for project performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors use interview data from buyers and suppliers in six case studies of firms involved in ten collaborative innovation projects. The four constructs of the RV are used to observe how firms govern triadic relationships, combine complementary resources, invest in relationship-specific assets and manage information and knowledge exchange with and between suppliers in innovation projects. Findings Four archetypes of triadic relationships in innovation projects – labeled Triangle, A-frame, D-Frame and Line – are presented and characterized in terms of their structural and relational features. The authors discuss how each triad archetype is applicable to different innovation projects according to specific project characteristics. Originality/value This study is pioneering in its empirical examination of triadic relationships in collaborative innovation projects. It provides a novel typology of four archetypes of triad from the perspective of collaborative relationships with suppliers. Through applying the RV, it advances understanding of how triadic relationships are governed, how they invest in relationship-specific assets, how they combine complementary resources and how they exchange knowledge and information in each type of triad appropriate to different innovation project settings. To date, much of the extant literature has focused on dyads.

How COVID-19 pandemic has shaped buyer-supplier relationships in engineering companies with ethical perception considerations: A multi-methodological study

“…However, in this study, we have revealed that ethical perceptions of the buying firm in the mind of suppliers would positively influence the propensity for collaboration, particularly during the supply crisis. The findings explain why suppliers prefer to share resources with selected buying firms and not with all of them ( Pulles et al, 2016 , Moradlou et al, 2022 , Patrucco et al, 2022 ). Prior literature also indicates that opportunism and transaction-based B2B buyer-supplier dealings will actually fail to work under COVID-19.…”

Learning by supplying to climb the value chain: suppliers’ transition from B-to-B to B-to-C

“…Thus, the learning by interaction (Patrucco et al , 2022) enhances the breadth and depth of the learning process of suppliers and source of implementation of new aspects in formal and informal routines, has a positive effect on the cumulative learning stock of the suppliers (Corradini and D'Ippolito, 2022). The respondents narrated as:…”

“…Given that major buyers tend to require high fashioned and sophisticated products, processes and treatments, suppliers need to modernize their operations and production facilities to match the buyers’ specifications (Grönroos and Voima, 2013). In addition, the suppliers modernize their production capabilities to create the needed value for the buyers and themselves (Anning-Dorson et al , 2018; Patrucco et al , 2022) over time.…”

“…The cross-case analysis highlighted the beneficial role of buyer relations and the effect of their specifications on the knowledge acquisition and learning related to designing, NPD, contemporary finishing and washings and other technical dimensions (Love and Ganotakis, 2013; Patrucco et al , 2022).…”

A start-up’s collaboration in networks for sustainable freight transport: a micro-meso-macro approach to innovation

“…In recent decades, innovation has become an inevitable part of supply networks, and studies show that it is increasingly collaborative in nature (Baldwin and Von Hippel, 2011; Chapman and Corso, 2005; Patrucco et al , 2022). For example, supplier collaboration, customer involvement in product development and innovation in networks involving multiple actors are high on the agenda for industry and academia.…”