1977
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1977.4406740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing the Career Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
109
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Flattened hierarchies mean that there are fewer positions at senior levels, reducing the opportunities for upward movement (Chao 1990;Evans, Gunz and Jalland 1997;Burke 2002). More employees are therefore likely to reach a hierarchical plateau, a point where the probability of vertical advancement is very low (Ference, Stoner and Warren 1977). Unless they are willing to look outside their present organization and venture out on the external labour market, these employees will probably have to remain in the same position for longer, with the inherent risk of languishing on a content plateau where their work no longer offers them any opportunities or challenges (Bardwick 1986;McCleese and Eby 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Flattened hierarchies mean that there are fewer positions at senior levels, reducing the opportunities for upward movement (Chao 1990;Evans, Gunz and Jalland 1997;Burke 2002). More employees are therefore likely to reach a hierarchical plateau, a point where the probability of vertical advancement is very low (Ference, Stoner and Warren 1977). Unless they are willing to look outside their present organization and venture out on the external labour market, these employees will probably have to remain in the same position for longer, with the inherent risk of languishing on a content plateau where their work no longer offers them any opportunities or challenges (Bardwick 1986;McCleese and Eby 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Considerable evidence indicates that reaching a career plateau may result in negative consequences, such as decreased job and career satisfaction (Chang, 2003;McCleese & Eby, 2006), reduced organizational commitment (McCleese & Eby, 2006), unsatisfactory performance (Stout, Slocum, & Cron, 1988), and increased intention to quit (Hofstetter & Cohen, 2014). The career plateau was traditionally defined as a point in one's career beyond which promotion becomes highly unlikely (Ference, Stoner, & Warren, 1977), followed by Feldman and Weitz's (1988) extension of the connotation of little likelihood of obtaining assignments of increased responsibility. This traditional view focuses on a hierarchical (or structural) plateau, which concerns employees' vertical movement in the organization (Allen et al, 1999;Bardwick, 1986) and has been dominantly studied in the career plateau literature (ArmstrongStassen, 2008;Xie, Lu, & Zhou, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The majority of plateauing research focuses on hierarchical plateaus, which occur when individuals have low perceptions of upward mobility opportunities in the organization (Ference, et al, 1977). However, some researchers (Chao, 1990;Choy and Savery 1998) argue this focus on hierarchical plateaus provides a limited perspective on individuals' career mobility.…”
Section: Existing Research On Plateausmentioning
confidence: 99%