2004
DOI: 10.1080/07352680490433295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing Soil Microorganisms to Improve Productivity of Agro-Ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
179
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 325 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 246 publications
2
179
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…PGPR can be divided into two groups according to their relationship with the plants: symbiotic bacteria and free-living rhizobacteria (Khan, 2005). As reviewed by Compant et al (2005), Glick (1995Glick ( , 2001, Hall (2002), Hallman et al (1997), Lucy et al (2004), Sturz et al (2000), and Welbaum et al (2004), a lot of work have been done on the mechanisms and principles of the PGPR-plant relationship, which was accepted widely as rhizosphere effect. Generally, PGPR function in three different ways (Glick, 1995(Glick, , 2001): synthesizing particular compounds for the plants, facilitating the uptake of certain nutrients from the environment (Çakmakçi et al, 2006;Lucas García et al, 2004a,b;Siddiqui and Mahmood, 2001), and lessening or preventing the plants from diseases (Guo et al, 2004;Jetiyanon and Kloepper, 2002;Raj et al, 2003;Saravanakumar et al, in press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PGPR can be divided into two groups according to their relationship with the plants: symbiotic bacteria and free-living rhizobacteria (Khan, 2005). As reviewed by Compant et al (2005), Glick (1995Glick ( , 2001, Hall (2002), Hallman et al (1997), Lucy et al (2004), Sturz et al (2000), and Welbaum et al (2004), a lot of work have been done on the mechanisms and principles of the PGPR-plant relationship, which was accepted widely as rhizosphere effect. Generally, PGPR function in three different ways (Glick, 1995(Glick, , 2001): synthesizing particular compounds for the plants, facilitating the uptake of certain nutrients from the environment (Çakmakçi et al, 2006;Lucas García et al, 2004a,b;Siddiqui and Mahmood, 2001), and lessening or preventing the plants from diseases (Guo et al, 2004;Jetiyanon and Kloepper, 2002;Raj et al, 2003;Saravanakumar et al, in press).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under such circumstances, organic inputs such as microbial inoculants hold promise in control of disease and promotion of growth of broad bean in farmers' field. In general, biological control has been considered as an alternative or a supplementing way of reducing use of chemicals in agriculture [5,6]. Several rhizobacterial strains have been successfully exploited elsewhere in control of damping off and root diseases of several crops [7,8] and in management of nutrient under sustainable crop production [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is more, organic compounds, which have been out of people's attention for economical reasons, are again spotlighted along with their application to improved price competitiveness, low risk of environmental pollution and innovative tools of genetic engineering. We also expect a large room for the role of metagenome in increasing agricultural productivity and the utilization and reformulation of biomass [54,55]. Besides, research on human metagenome can derive the causes of diseases and new treatment methods through the analyses of qualitative and quantitative dynamics of microbial communities [56,57].…”
Section: The Value Of Metagenome Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%