Managing ‘shades of grey’: a focus group study exploring community-dwellers’ views on advance care planning in older people

Abstract

BackgroundCommunity-dwelling consumers of healthcare are increasing, many aging with life-limiting conditions and deteriorating cognition. However, few have had advance care planning discussions or completed documentation to ensure future care preferences are acted upon. This study examines the awareness, attitudes, and experiences of advance care planning amongst older people and unrelated offspring/caregivers of older people residing in the community.MethodsQualitative descriptive research, which included focus groups with older people (55+ years) and older people’s offspring/caregivers living in an Australian city and surrounding rural region. Data was analysed using an inductive and comparative approach. Sampling was both convenience and purposive. Participants responded to web-based, newsletter or email invitations from an agency, which aims to support healthcare consumers, a dementia support group, or community health centres in areas with high proportions of culturally and linguistically diverse community-dwellers.ResultsEight focus groups were attended by a homogenous sample of 15 older people and 27 offspring/caregivers, with 43% born overseas. The overarching theme, ‘shades of grey’: struggles in transition, reflects challenges faced by older people and their offspring/caregivers as older people often erratically transition from independence and capacity to dependence and/or incapacity. Offspring/caregivers regularly struggled with older people’s fluctuating autonomy and dependency as older people endeavoured to remain at home, and with conceptualising “best times” to actualise advance care planning with substitute decision maker involvement. Advance care planning was supported and welcomed, x advance care planning literacy was evident. Difficulties planning for hypothetical health events and socio-cultural attitudes thwarting death-related discussions were emphasised. Occasional offspring/caregivers with previous substitute decision maker experience reported distress related to their decisions.ConclusionsAdvance care planning programs traditionally assume participants are ‘planning ready’ to legally appoint a substitute decision maker (power of attorney) and record end-of-life treatment preferences in short time frames. This contrasts with how community dwelling older people and offspring/caregivers conceive future care decisions over time. Advance care planning programs need to include provision of information, which supports older people’s advance care planning understanding and management, and also supports offspring/caregivers’ development of strategies for broaching advance care planning with older people, and preparing for potential substitute decision maker roles. Development and integration of strategies to support older people’s decision-making when in the ‘grey zone’, with fluctuating cognitive capacities, needs further consideration. Findings support an advance care planning model with conversations occurring at key points across a person’s lifespan.

Does implementation matter if comprehension is lacking? A qualitative investigation into perceptions of advance care planning in people with cancer

“…Recommendations about, and an approach to, reviewing and updating ACP documentation is also likely to improve the relevance and utility of these documents. These results, along with others, [11,21,22] also demonstrate the important contribution of qualitative research in understanding how ACP can be optimised.…”

“…A qualitative study consisting of focus groups with older people and caregivers found that some caregivers who had acted in a substitute decision maker role previously experienced distress related to their decisions. [21] Similarly, another recent qualitative study with patients and their substitute decision-makers, found substitute decision-makers can have different views to patients, and efforts to promote ACP may be most successful if patient and substitute decision-maker beliefs are addressed. [22] Past research also found that some caregivers could make subsidiary plans and not necessarily follow patient advance care plans.…”

Feeding Intolerance in a Patient with Advanced Parkinson’s Disease and Vascular Dementia: Lessons Learnt

“…It is conceivable that the demand for complex nursing care will increase, requiring additional CSU places or the expansion of the capabilities of existing NHs. prognosticating survival [24][25][26][27] , uncertainty and conflicts of opinion between patients and their caregivers 28 and the loss of patients' mental capacity. Nevertheless, it is critical for doctors to actively overcome this friction and seek out appropriate moments to initiate the ACP process with these patients to improve end of life care, patient and family satisfaction and reduce stress and anxiety in surviving relatives 29 .…”

Health production for elderly persons and their caregivers

“…It is important that a family talks about the planning of care throughout life, so that when an elderly person becomes dependent, it has been previously agreed who will be the legal representative or caregiver, or whether the person prefers to be institutionalized. 10 When caregivers talked about their history with the elderly persons in the workshops, they often revealed a history of conflict, hurt and forgiveness. On this occasion, they were reflective, and some even cried.…”