2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing saltwater intrusion using conjugate sharp interface and density dependent models linked with pumping optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study on the Puri aquifer, Dey and Prakash simulated saline water and optimized the number and location of pumping wells. They showed that in addition to doubling the pumping speed, further infiltration of saline water into the aquifer could be prevented by using the optimal model [23]. Fan et al presented a simulation-optimization method applied to Longkou city, China, with the aim of maximizing groundwater exploitation and minimizing seawater intrusion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study on the Puri aquifer, Dey and Prakash simulated saline water and optimized the number and location of pumping wells. They showed that in addition to doubling the pumping speed, further infiltration of saline water into the aquifer could be prevented by using the optimal model [23]. Fan et al presented a simulation-optimization method applied to Longkou city, China, with the aim of maximizing groundwater exploitation and minimizing seawater intrusion.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation‐optimization (SO) frameworks have been proven to be effective tools to identify optimal groundwater management strategies (Baù & Mayer, 2006; Christelis & Mantoglou, 2019; Dey & Prakash, 2020; Mayer et al., 2002; Rajabi & Ketabchi, 2017; D. K. Roy & Datta, 2020). A SO framework is typically characterized by three components: an optimization formulation to the groundwater management problem, a process‐based groundwater simulation model and an optimization algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second group considers restrictions to SWI due to aquifer pumping, typically formulated in relation to groundwater salinity. Groundwater salinity constraints have been expressed in terms of freshwater‐saltwater interface location when neglecting solute dispersion effects, as at regional aquifer scales, which have allowed to adopt “sharp‐interface” models (Christelis & Mantoglou, 2016; Dey & Prakash, 2020; Ferreira da Silva & Haie, 2007; Kopsiaftis et al., 2019; Stratis et al., 2017). At smaller aquifer scales, where the assumption of miscible freshwater and saltwater is needed, salinity constraints have been prescribed as salt concentration limits at control points, such as pumping wells or monitoring wells, which have required the use of variable density flow models that are more complex and computationally more expensive than sharp‐interface models (Christelis & Mantoglou, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge only a few studies in density-driven groundwater flow systems implement a fusion of HF and LF model data for computationally expensive simulation frameworks, and these are mostly found in seawater intrusion modeling (e.g. Kerrou and Renard, 2010;Christelis andMantoglou, 2016, 2019;Dey and Prakash, 2020;Christelis, 2021). In general, multifidelity surrogate models have been less popular than surrogates of a single high-fidelity model in past groundwater and environmental modeling studies (Razavi et al, 2012a;Asher et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%