2017
DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2017.1292076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing resources through stakeholder networks: collaborative water governance for Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya

Abstract: Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis were used to analyze stakeholders' social and structural characteristics based on their interests, influence and interactions in Lake Naivasha basin, Kenya. Even though the Kenyan government and its agencies seem to command higher influence and interest in water resource management, the presence of influential and central stakeholders from non-government sectors plays a key role in strengthening partnership in a governance environment with multiple sectors, comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developed countries have made considerable progress in these efforts [28,29] which are driven by the need to incorporate local perspectives and values in water governance. However, in many developing countries, citizen participation in water resources management is taking root [27,[30][31][32].Studies show various conditions that influence knowledge, attitude and practices in relation to water management. These conditions include geographical experiences, such as information on climatic conditions and changing river regimes; farm characteristics, such as farm location relative to a water source; and social experiences, such as membership to a social network [25,26,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developed countries have made considerable progress in these efforts [28,29] which are driven by the need to incorporate local perspectives and values in water governance. However, in many developing countries, citizen participation in water resources management is taking root [27,[30][31][32].Studies show various conditions that influence knowledge, attitude and practices in relation to water management. These conditions include geographical experiences, such as information on climatic conditions and changing river regimes; farm characteristics, such as farm location relative to a water source; and social experiences, such as membership to a social network [25,26,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developed countries have made considerable progress in these efforts [28,29] which are driven by the need to incorporate local perspectives and values in water governance. However, in many developing countries, citizen participation in water resources management is taking root [27,[30][31][32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of participatory water resource management has been widely used in recent times in sustainable development discourse and practices in different parts of India and abroad (Ogada et al 2017). It has now been realized that the greater involvement of local communities in development activities, planning, governance and decision-making is very important as it has the potentiality to make the system more equitable, effective and efficient (Ananda and Proctor 2013;Bastakoti, et al 2010;de Boer et al 2016;Fish, Ioris and Watson 2010;Hare, Letcher and Jakeman 2003;Sultana 2009;Von Korff et al 2012;Wehn et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restoration, protection and recovery of the lake's natural fringe zone of Cyperus papyrus could help reduce eutrophication. Relevant activities include facilitating a transition to a clear water state and promote macrophyte growth (Harper & Mavuti, ; Hickley et al., ), applying improved water management schemes with the aim of maintaining water availability and quality (Becht & Harper, ; Oyugi et al., ; Van Oel et al., ), implementing conservation management frameworks and collaborative management (co‐management) to improve the lake ecosystem services and fishery resources (Gherardi et al., ; Hickley et al., ; Kuhn, Britz, Willy, & Van Oel, ; Kundu et al., ; Mulatu, Van Oel, & Van der Veen, ; Ogada, Krhoda, Van der Veen, Marani, & Van Oel, ; Waithaka, Mugo, Obegi, & Last, ) and linking socioeconomic factors to eco‐hydrological processes that can greatly improve understanding of the lake's eco‐hydrological system (Harper et al., ; Odongo et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%