2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing relationships with public officials — A case of foreign MNCs in Russia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not least, the shadowy side of social relationships (both private-private and private-public) in business networks is worth intensified attention in order to gain a better understanding of the seamy side of many developing economies: the black market and corruption where officials act as quasibusiness actors with access to public resources. In their recent publication on foreign multinationals' relationships with public officials in Russia, Salmi and Heikkilä (2015) call specifically for in-depth studies of informal interactions within private-public networks in the post-Soviet space. Given the pervasive informality of the business landscape in many non-Western markets, the proposed framework may help to answer questions about specific underlying social structures and mechanisms that (re-)create social capital and make business partners provide valuable resources to each other virtually in the absence of formal contracts.…”
Section: Methodological Directions and Empirical Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not least, the shadowy side of social relationships (both private-private and private-public) in business networks is worth intensified attention in order to gain a better understanding of the seamy side of many developing economies: the black market and corruption where officials act as quasibusiness actors with access to public resources. In their recent publication on foreign multinationals' relationships with public officials in Russia, Salmi and Heikkilä (2015) call specifically for in-depth studies of informal interactions within private-public networks in the post-Soviet space. Given the pervasive informality of the business landscape in many non-Western markets, the proposed framework may help to answer questions about specific underlying social structures and mechanisms that (re-)create social capital and make business partners provide valuable resources to each other virtually in the absence of formal contracts.…”
Section: Methodological Directions and Empirical Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a practical way, they thus tend to be more relativistic than their American counterparts, that is they reject universal rules when making ethical judgements (Robertson, Gilley, & Street, 2003). Generally, Russians value much more networking (Salmi & Heikkilä, 2015) and informal relations (Ledeneva, 2006) to processes. Finally, the concept of blat (the use of personal networks) is still very important, even if it has evolved since Soviet times from a process to get access to certain resources to a way to "compensate for the failure of formal organizations" (Ledeneva, 2009).…”
Section: The Russian Contemporary Civil Society Is Associated With Different Attributes Comparedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the values (Hofstede, 2003) driving different ways of organizing operations, behaving and dealing with difficulty. Particularly, when Western Eu-ropean tend to rely essentially to processes, Russians value much more networking (Salmi and Heikkilä, 2015), and informal relations (Ledeneva, 2006). If this attitude may explain a lack of continuity on the Russian side, because actions may be more linked to the relation than to the process, it often leads Western European to disregard informal practices (Elenkov, 1997;Ledeneva, 2006, p. 101).…”
Section: Factors Of Influence At the Micropolitical Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%