2005
DOI: 10.1163/1569159053444626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing rattan as a common property: a case study of community rattan management in Nepal

Abstract: Rattan is one of the most important non-timber forest products mostly distributed and highly traded in Southeast Asia. Out of 600 species in the world, only 7 species occur in Nepal, but these play a significant role in the income generation of communities. However, rattan resource base has been depleted significantly due to overexploitation, immature harvesting and habitat destruction. This paper highlights a case study of community rattan management in the far western development Terai region of Nepal. The i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example of Sati Karnali Community Forest User Group showed that benefit increased 5 to 6 times (i.e. before RMP benefit was Rs 0.2 million which was reached up to 4 to5 million (Paudel & Chowdhary, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example of Sati Karnali Community Forest User Group showed that benefit increased 5 to 6 times (i.e. before RMP benefit was Rs 0.2 million which was reached up to 4 to5 million (Paudel & Chowdhary, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green weight and dry weight of rattan cane was estimated in major three community forests of Kailali and Bardiya district. According to Paudel and Chowdhary (2005) green weight of rattan with leaf sheath is 1.24 kg per rattan cane height of 6 meter. Weight difference of rattan with and without leaf sheath is 25%.…”
Section: Green and Dry Weight Of Rattan Canementioning
confidence: 99%
“…attan is one of the economically high potential non-wood forest products (NWFPs) (Bystriakova et al, 2000;Belcher, 1995)contributing to biodiversity as well as local economy (Weinstock, 1983) in Nepal contributing 20−30% demand of the Nepalese rattan industries (MDBRPP/DFRS, 2010; Chowdhary & Paudel, 2008). Overexploitation, poor forest management (Bystriakova et al, 2000)and loss of forest habitats were found to have threatened the existence of rattan in Nepal (Chowdhary, 1994;Paudel & Chowdhary, 1996;2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%