2011
DOI: 10.1504/ijmie.2011.037757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Managing quality in online education: a conceptual model for program development and improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another article Kokic et al (2013) explore how lecturer and administrator collaborate to facilitate multi-dimensional learning and teaching through an online course development. Earlier articles related to online course learning and teaching still include Davis et al (2011), Bolliger and Wasilik (2009), Wilson and Stacey (2004), etc. Our minicourse design extensively employs online communication tools such as QQ group, WeChat and Superstar platform to promote mobile teaching and learning.…”
Section: Mobile Internet As a Complementary Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another article Kokic et al (2013) explore how lecturer and administrator collaborate to facilitate multi-dimensional learning and teaching through an online course development. Earlier articles related to online course learning and teaching still include Davis et al (2011), Bolliger and Wasilik (2009), Wilson and Stacey (2004), etc. Our minicourse design extensively employs online communication tools such as QQ group, WeChat and Superstar platform to promote mobile teaching and learning.…”
Section: Mobile Internet As a Complementary Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of his study indicated that the professor does not reach the level of performance to the degree of expected competence due to the need for academic methods and skills that lead to the expected improved academic performance. Davis, Sauber, and Edwards (2011) claimed that there is near universal agreement that in order for online programs in higher education to be viewed as legitimate and valuable, high quality needs to be assured. In their study, they presented a comprehensive conceptual framework which identifies the features, benchmarks, and institutional practices, quality of instructors, expectations and suggestions of a quality model for online programs in higher education.…”
Section: Review Of Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%